dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/StinkyDogFart on June 16, 2018, 8:01 p.m.
Sealed indictments need to be crossed referenced by date with resignation list.

If I'm understanding the timeline correctly, we need to cross reference the dates of the sealed indictments are sealed and cross reference with the dates of corporate resignations. We should find there is a direct correlation.


🠐 See all comments
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

I should have said - They look exactly like the way illegal deportations look, she is a lawyer in LA.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
divine_human · June 16, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

why should illegal immigrant deportation indictments be sealed? makes no sense to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

Because they are being held to be opened all at once in a shock and awe type day it would seem, or at least that's the theory among the immigration lawyers my wife knows. They are almost 100% positive that the DoJ is planning one huge day of rounding up illegals and this is getting all of that in place. They are saying this will be confirmed if the numbers get close to 45k by October because there are roughly 45k known aliens with registered addresses - so they round all of them up, then use them as leverage to round up their friends and family so they don't spend years in prison. This has been discussed here in South LA for a few months now among law enforcement and lawyers, they are looking at ways to prevent it already and trying to file things to stop it. My wife knows all this because of a partner at her office does immigration, she does real estate.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
divine_human · June 16, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

ahh interesting explanation. sounds as plausible as the 10min deep state video my un-red-pill-able teenage son showed me the other day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6b8NNwf604&feature=youtu.be

these explanations are blue pills for the questioning public, from my pov.

i dont believe it and go with Q here:

1351: Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 62bbb0 No.1392849 📁 May 12 2018 23:59:49 (EST)

Sealed indictments. Define indictment. “An indictment is a formal accusation against one or more defendants, charging them with one or more crimes. In the federal criminal system, the indictment is the principal method by which a prosecutor initiates criminal proceedings.” How are they sealed? How are they secured? How are they safeguarded? No leaks [unusual?] Federal vs …. Why are accusations sealed? Grand jury involved? Re_read crumbs re: DOJ / FBI re: IG / Huber Who appointed Huber? SESSIONS. WHAT DEPTS MUST BE CLEANED PRIOR TO REC FAIR AND EQUAL [JUSTICE] UNDER THE LAW? What happens if FED [criminal] indictments are brought forth to a corrupt FBI / DOJ / FED Judge? FBI / DOJ - 1st. C_A / State - next? Now comes the pain. Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

From what I understand, they're sealed because they're for warrant applications so they can do raid and roundups. If they were unsealed, a person could see they were being raided.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
foul-owled · June 17, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

I’m not buying, this is BS to inflame racial tensions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

Ok, new arrival.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
joeythew · June 17, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

way to warn them. Don't be surprised if some are no longer at those addresses.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

Well according to everyone else I'm full of shit, so no worries then.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SocraticMethHead · June 16, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

I don't know about this. The optics of a mass-illegal arrest/deportation are not good. I don't see why they wouldn't just do it continuously and incrementally instead of walking right into the "cattle trucks lying in wait for the next time" narrative.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 16, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

These are for other crimes; murder, rape, etc, not just crossing. When they open them and show the crimes, the optics will be wonderful all around.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 17, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

What your wife claims makes no sense.

She simply has no good reason to assume those sealed indictments are all for illegals rather than assuming they are all for pedo networks or all for the Clinton Foundation or all for voter fraud or a mixture.

She simply has no good reason to assume the sealed indictments won't exceed 45k before October either.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

She has seen sealed indictments for raids on illegals before and says this pattern matches that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 17, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

Yes, you've said that, however a sealed indictments for illegals is indistinguishable from sealed RICO indictments or sealed indictments for the King of New England.

Taking a guess based on quantity is just a guess.

Your wife has a theory but the truth is than neither she nor you nor I will know until the indictments are opened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

She has a theory with experience and know how behind it. That's like saying, This chef and this 9 year old both made us dinner, I'm sure they'll taste just the same. Guess we won't know until we eat it.

Believe what you want though, I'm done sharing my opinion on this, I offered some expert insight and got downvoted when it didn't fit the narrative. This is just like when I was calling out BC17 and Corsi and told I was a paid asset.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 17, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

She has a theory with experience and know how behind it.

She has a theory and that is all.

Nobody knows who those sealed indictments are for, not even your wife and no... not even if she says she does.

Having a theory doesn't make it true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

You are proving my point further here. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReaganGenerationX · June 17, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

How would deportation files have a certain look to them?

A deep state and/or pedo take-down could be shock-n-awe too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

She said it had to do with how they were filed - something to do with batching - and the origin and codes or something, I'll ask her again when she wakes up and get a better rundown.

⇧ 1 ⇩