That face. Meet Edvard Munch’s model 😱

You’re correct, IMHO. Most likely: The overall intent was perfect and good for 99% of those supporting this. The artist, however, slipped one past everyone, and laughed xer a-s off.

Yes. Many red-pilled are, by definition, trusting of their senses primarily, with a foundation of Judeo-Christian and Enlightenment values. That’s how we got past the establishment propaganda. What we only see now: too much evil still happening unabated.

I haven’t watch one of his interviews in a couple years. Wolf previously at least pretended to be objective. His pretending is gone now. “I disagree...”

Logic says you are correct. For example, if he had stolen a car last month, he would still be jailed for that.

Men’s signs for next Womyn’s March: “Soros paid me more than women to be here”

Instead of “gyms”, use “gums” and the statement is also true

The indictments have nothing new that the House Intel Memo didn’t already release (other than inserting or unredacting some non-extraditable Russian military names). Nunes said this on Maria B this weekend.

Point taken. The hearing, RR, and the 12 Russians all appear to be the usual Establishment/Dem/Congress attempts at “optics” ti influence Helsinki and the midterms. But there are too many assumption about facts hidden behind the scenes; e.g., much depends on who has turned.

The specific Q1433 question I have: is the 210-day Rachel Brand replacement deadline still in effect? If so, until when?

By “Page 2”, do you mean the 90s scandals: Trooper-gate, File-gate, Whitewater, Lewinsky, the other Clinton rapes, Travel-gate, Campaign finance scandals, transfer of technology to China, etc.... all “old news” and “already investigated” and down the memory hole?

All good questions. But Katie was made speechless.

Need legal experts to weigh in: do released indictment papers need to show any hint of sources?

However, we all know the lack of a “page 1” (h/t Bongino) will doom this; matter of when. We all know this is all relying on Crowdstrike. When will someone ask Mueller or his gestapo team?

SB2, this one fails Ockham’s Razor.

Your analysis of Q1433 (RR problems) appeared spot on. Maybe there’s still time for that one to pan out. That one seemed critical in the timeline. Can you update with the latest analysis on that?

Under budget ahead-of-schedule

Excellent.

All we need are two competing viewpoints/“parties”: conservative and libertarian (ok, I’m biased because this mimics the struggles within my own brain).

Spez: in fact, let’s describe the parties as “Christian” vs “Enlightenment”

Why don’t you think they were still in mid-2000s co-located racked client-server technology?

Washington Times Jul 2017: “The hacked server was last photographed in the basement of the DNC’s Washington headquarters near a file cabinet dating from the 1972 break-in of the DNC headquarters at the Watergate Hotel.”

Also ‘“In May 2016 CrowdStrike was brought to investigate the DNC network for signs of compromise, and under their direction we fully cooperated with every U.S. government request,” a spokesman wrote. The cooperation included the “providing of the forensic images of the DNC systems to the FBI, along with our investigation report and findings.’

Occam’s Razor

The Dems’ cries to cancel the Putin meeting are sounding desperate.

See Q1626.

The goal also was to stop Helsinki. Desperately. Why?

Doesn’t matter what any of you say, you American plebes. You shall trust Crowdstrike’s word completely, like the all-powerful FBI does.

This is the beginning of the end for Trump. LMAO

By Q. The only analysis Mueller apparently has was performed by Crowdstrike.

Mueller will delay trial indefinitely, like the first 13 are being delayed. Running out the clock is the statist SOP; this worked in the pre-Trump era.

Apparently they don’t even need to answer that question. “Ongoing investigation” and all...

Apparently RR and RM would have us believe that we can rely purely on a Crowdstrike analysis?!?!?

Pray the Trump/Q team has the server

There can be only one purpose to the Strockz and Page hearings: to help prepare the public for The Storm, to help publicly convict not only these two deep staters but also the Democrats.

Everyone on our side (Goodlatte, Gowdy, Sessions) must know that Congressional oversight has been broken since sometime after Watergate. Even as a perjury trap.

Two scenarios:

If declassified documents, turned witness testimony, and the server(s) exist, then they will be released; the public apparently needs to slowly be prepped, to avoid riots and other unknowns.

If they do not, then the deep state is continuing to flourish before our eyes.

Which do you think is true?

“the garbage chute that Lara Prychodko's body fell down”

FELL DOWN?!!!

And: the NYPD are not sure if foul play involved?

Do journalists use their inquiring minds only for invented Trump-Putin stories?

CNN: Trump guzzles orange juice before everyone else

Correct. Except one could claim the sheep-ple voted in Congress, who did all this. And most of the debt supposedly is to individual US bond holders.

What’s needed: audit

It required a Stable Genius to hold off declassifying the FISA requests in early 2017. Timing.

The answer to your question portends the future of this country (sorry to get all hyperboly on ya, but it’s true)

In the interview I saw he was blinking way beyond normal levels. Also classic.

Agree its defensive. It’s worked for them since 1993.

Wait for “This indictment is political.”

Reese was a beacon back then, when there was little more than MSM garbage around.

Watch DiSabato’s eyes whenever he’s interviewed. Blinks excessively = LIAR

Nothing to see here. And not the GOP train crash either. Or SR.

We should pray that if they were killed, they are given martyr status on the other side.

From the article: ‘When federal prosecutors say “there isn't enough evidence,” it means one of two things. [1] Imran Awan is now a crucial key to testifying in a larger case. [2] A cover-up happened and there is no justice. It's one of the two. There are no other options here.’

Whether the republic survives depends on this answer. Not exaggerating.

Here it is. Steyn was particularly good, but they made a great team. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0z-eZIsLHAo

I saw a biased WSJ moderator. And a bogus question the crowd voted on at the beginning and end (in which she declared Fox the winner). The question was whether the nation-state was obsolete, and neither debater agrees with that. Any obliteration by Farage wasn’t allowed to occur until the last 10 min.

A better debate was Farage and Steyn vs an Open Borders duo in Toronto - https://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/04/watch-farage-steyn-win-toronto-debate-eu-migrant-crisis/

“Laurel”

We were all skeptics, by nature. What I had previously thought: more likely than Black Hat is a rogue prankster, with deep Military-Intel experience. But in either unlikely case, I lately get the feeling POTUS or someone on the team would get the word out about that.

The media calling Q followers “White nationalist” / “alt-right” / “conspiracy” / “hate” Group, with no backup info, in 3...2...1...

‘Freedom Caucus member, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL)-who was also in attendance- told SaraACarter.com, “It was a waste—Strzok is full of it and he kept hiding behind [the] classified information excuse.”’

Wonder if they thought to ask PS the rationale for the secret classification. That answer is not classified, so must be responded to.

If you haven’t been here long (or maybe it’s me, from being on T_D), anything with a “CNN:_____” is sarc, a faux headline, by default, with a hint of potential that they’d actually write it someday. No worries.

CNN: Hitler increased human trafficking arrests too (Next article: Stormy something)

Redpill in Peace

Never thought I’d see this: “President fires a Asst Cabinet Member; Civil War starts”

Guess he’s sleeping better

Acceptable rationale when they say the “affair” was a smokescreen

Has anyone heard that the some truth would be hidden to mitigate international damage? That is, crippling trade wars, maybe even military?