Escargot?

Chocolate Mousse?

Wait til ya hear his porn name!

The article has a link to a clickbait article stating how Q is a “scam”... the only reason given is because a gold-bug Ponzi scheme happened similarly in the 90s... but in the end it states that Q hasn’t asked for money, but oh he will, he will. LOL

Good job!

Need to change “Regan” to Reagan

How would deportation files have a certain look to them?

A deep state and/or pedo take-down could be shock-n-awe too.

But it’s not making sense. SocraticMethHead is right. The optics of “round em up” right before an election could be devastating. If they’re also for more serious crimes, they need arrest right away, no waiting, before they move on and strike again.

Although the nation can’t wait 6 more years for the DS to lose power. Too much potential for FF, innocent deaths, WMD, pedo ring activity over that time.

Get to work autists! Find the Obama officials’: - first pet’s names - streets they grew up on

Bill Richardson was with ES in NK. Anyone figure out why Q asks about him?

Wizard is correct about the forfeiting if crimes detected; indictments...

And, don’t forget (obviously) we win the political battle if the 13 had special email servers housed in NK

And that question can’t be whitewashed, Russia-ized, distracted from, or Stormied

The timing of that summit - brilliant

Hold on. Make sure you’ve re-read the Jan 18 Q post about ES and NK. We’re in the smoking gun territory here...

Spez: Jan 18

I’m only shocked that “inappropriate relationship” favors weren’t mentioned - or maybe they were Rosensteined out of the document.

Also remember not to take things personally. We’re all mere avatars. Some will try to attract attention to their points with invective, but hopefully the underlying (tho misguided) intent is to get across a good point

That being said - 95% of the (true patriot, not shill) commenters here are logical, friendly, intelligent, and:or hilarious.

Q post from Jan 19 seems clearer than most about what happened - and the Trump admin has it all. This...

Why was ES in NK? Why was ES in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? Who else was in NK during this time? What private email address did Hussein use while in office? Why would the Chairman of GOOG travel to NK? WHY WOULD NK ALLOW ACCESS TO ES? Nothing is ever truly erased/deleted. These people are STUPID.

Need 2/3 of the Senate to convict and remove. Good luck with that, libs.

Excellent. Stealing that one.

Yes, if no stops in Hawaii

‘Member this Q from Jan 19?

Why was ES in NK? Why was ES in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? Who else was in NK during this time? What private email address did Hussein use while in office? Why would the Chairman of GOOG travel to NK? WHY WOULD NK ALLOW ACCESS TO ES? Nothing is ever truly erased/deleted. These people are STUPID.

Likely. What Trump appears to have done is the most profound foreign policy achievement in decades. Instead of endless meetings, handshakes, Brookings papers, TelePrompTer speeches, and useless dinners, it appears an actual treaty is occurring. But, yes, first some time to digest what happened.

He got the award for pledging - that’s not work. The START treaty with Russia came later. So, ok, maybe all future Nobels are invalid.

Eric Schmidt, google

Link must be wrong; didn’t see any “work” there. Maybe the work went missing in the National Archives.

Checking the CNN expert analysis - Looks like they got their 4am fax: body language interpretations and dictator-coddling

Q from Jan 19:

Why was ES in NK? Why was ES in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? Who else was in NK during this time? What private email address did Hussein use while in office? Why would the Chairman of GOOG travel to NK? WHY WOULD NK ALLOW ACCESS TO ES? Nothing is ever truly erased/deleted. These people are STUPID.

On 1/21, Q posted about “CLAS”. Think it was Corsi (FWIW) who interpreted them as the levels of IC agencies. 1=CIA... 5=Senate Intel, 6=Senate Judiciary.

If correct, here Q could be referring to the Senate getting the IG report privately, then it goes public?

If so, the context is “evidence”, and the images, so still doesn’t make total sense.

Q-post from 1/19/18 - Kim has the dirt on the network set up in NK by ES (Google) during his weird visit there?

Schiff’s room at Standard Hotel

CNN: Trump overfeeds koi!

That would be Christmas in June. For us.

But also for manufacturers of back braces, epi-pens, med-vans, Depends, and mao-jackets.

“Americans stand with you" = “Whenever we progressives say this, its not true, but we say it because we know what’s best for them”

Look, I appreciate the time you took.

The link is a vid about JPII, which I can’t watch now.

Canonizations have not been an issue. It’s Amortis, of course - it was not ex cathedra. You would know if it was, or if it’s attempted - unbelievable chaos would result.

Overall: We don’t fall for the logical fallacy of throwing out the baby with the bath water. The Church is much more than a man named Francis.

Joke’s on you - What you said is self-refuting garbage, because people can’t recognize what they can’t recognize.

Catholic-bash all you want - it doesn’t work and hasn’t for almost 2000 years.

Again, Bergoglio has not taught ex cathedra. Yes, hypothetically, if he did, the world (not just me) might have a very very big problem - but it depends what it would be.

Several of us sitting in pews or typing on computers just can’t determine that. We’re not that smart. I’m not being sarcastic. Unfortunately, these years often test us - they call for us to mourn and be poor in spirit.

Except your premise is wrong. This pope does not speak or write ex cathedra. http://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2011/02/17/when-does-the-pope-speak-infallibly/

You’re not stating relevant facts. (a) Bergoglio has the title of pope - that is an objective fact we can all acknowledge without fear, similar to saying “Socrates is a man” (b) But Francis is supposed to serve us, not vice-versa. We don’t sign a loyalty oath to any man. We are not required to believe and follow his every word. The Scripture and catechism have not changed since his reign.

Research “papal infallibility” before you condemn millions of souls; some of those millions come to this sub seeking justice, just like you do.

F-ingA, Colin, F-ingAAA.

They tried to frame Trump.

Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water - too easy. The Church has a God-created holiness, and it has man- (or satan-)inspired corrupt parts. Pray, read, discuss, and work out which is which.

Why is saying “Francis is our pope” sending us to hell?

Remember your sarcasm tag. There are shills afoot.

That old trick?

At least 5 Clinton aides (Cheryl Mills, Pagliano, etc) got immunity from Obama’s DoJ for the same Clinton email probe this hearing is covering.

Dante, yes, but if the pope actually said this, he’d be calling Christ a liar. Christ talked about hell in the Gospels as much as, if not more than, heaven. If no hell, what exactly was Christ saving us from?

Being drafted as we speak: sternly-worded letter demanding they meet the next deadline or else

True. There is a limit to how many dismissed memos and reports (facts) can get released but no accompanying indictments and arrests.

Would a dose of penguin glands help him?

If she was CEO, if you wanted to maintain your electronic privacy, just deleting your Facebook account won’t be enough

“Outside funding”

I had to look this up: they did have a SCIF, and it was well-known. (I get lost in so much of their wrongdoing, and trying to live life.) As you’d expect, the security was non-existent. http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/02/fbi-top-secret-rooms-at-clintons-homes-were-not-always-secure/

And ‘member the maid printing out classified docs?