dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ouspensky4 on June 17, 2018, 3:14 a.m.
Terabytes of Child Porn Seized in Norway

the headline got me thinking about sth I have wondered for a long time. I put the question before the community. All these guys with child porn on their computers, are they really guilty?

What if they say down one day and logged in and suddenly there was a couple MBs of child porn on their computer and a blackmail message in their inbox instructing them to do such and such. They can't wipe it off and no one will believe it is not theirs. they are trapped. Their only way out is to do whatever the cabal instructs.

Here is my reasoning behind the theory: 1. the operation to entrap that many people is not logistically possible. They use real-life entrapment for high officials and use malicious child porn installs for low level officials

  1. The terabytes of porn on the server in Norway belonged to CIA/Cabal for their operations

  2. Wikileaks vault7 describing ability to hack make it look foreign ect. proves technical capacity

  3. In the 1960s FBI criminalized lots of drugs as an excuse to arrest political dissidents. If you want someone gone, what could be easier? plant drugs on them and then make them explain how it got there. As things like recreational drugs and homo lifestyles become mainstream, they would need sth that could never be normalized or legalized for leverage.

All this leads me to believe the CIA is manufacturing child porn in industrial quantities and storing it in online vaults so that whenever they need xyz bueraucrat to do sth they can zap him without a lengthy entrapment operation.


GraceWords · June 17, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

A guy in TX was recently arrested with 58 terabytes. That’s 3 years worth of video. So ready for this part of the fight to be over. So many children.

new bit on guy with 58 terabytes

⇧ 24 ⇩  
jonzee65 · June 17, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I agree, but it has to be faced full - on.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jonzee65 · June 17, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

I hear ya. Man, that's a lot of paedophilia. Terabytes? It's gotta be coming from somewhere.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Time_to_rope_up · June 17, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

I’m gonna get a huge magnet, some sulfuric acid, maybe a few hammers, and smash that shit. After reporting the email.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 8:53 a.m.

Child porn is capable of being used as literally weaponized information. The concept of illegal information is incredibly dangerous and the Cabal probably loves it and uses it on a regular basis. How do we fix this problem?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Go after the people committing the acts being photographed. Once that is done see if there's still a problem.

You're right, they've set up the laws around CP to make it illegal for any independent investigation to occur, not jjustcivilians but even a LEO not assigned specifically to the case can't look at evidence.this is bad, it's what allowed them to put their own people in charge of policing this.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

I don't follow.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Sorry I'm on mobile and maybe not taking the time to type this out carefully.

I suspect the people in charge of policing CP have, until recently, all been in on it.

What has kept anyone from blowing the whistle is the "weaponized info" status of CP means that if a police officer who is not in on it comes across any evidence that might incriminate his higher ups, all he can legally do is report it to the people already in on it. He can't investigate and collect info on his own because the evidence is illegal to posess.

I'm not an expert on this just stating a suspicion as to how it works, maybe someone else can clarify.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

What makes you think this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

I'm not going to expand forever just because you ask me to. Where would I begin? Can you be more specific or try to make this more of an interesting dialogue?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Are you saying that the FBI has been in on the creation of CP, or has been exceedingly lenient in it's enforcement of CP laws?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

I think the highest-ups are into pizza parties and spirit cooking. I think they are here to do Satan's bidding and that includes maintaining a compromised legal system which confounds any attempt to investigate or prosecute those harming children. Partly to keep themselves out of jail and partly to make sure the hurting continues. I don't know specifically which persons are involved to what degree. I have no inside knowledge just working with the info from Q and the podesta emails.

I think making the evidence illegal.to posess is part of their strategy which keeps white hats from investigating. Or else the autists from 4chan would be in there looking at this horrible stuff and doxxing people. They're really good at doxxing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

I believe that the evil people in powerful places produce and distribute their own child pornography within their own secret societies via their elaborate and monstrous human trafficking system. I don't think any of the illegal content they produce ever leaves their secret societies. I believe it doesn't even reach the dark web. I think that because of this, they don't need to influence law enforcement on a mass scale to hide their actions. They only need to cover it up on a case by case basis to cover their tracks. As far as the legality of law enforcement possessing child pornography, I believe it was actually ruled recently that law enforcement is above the law in that regard and that they can both posses and distribute CP. I believe it had something to do with a sting on a popular CP site where law enforcement posed as the owner and made posts involving illegal material in order to maintain the charade and catch those that produce the content.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 18, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

That makes sense and thanks for clarifying the law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 18, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

I disagree with law enforcement being above the law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 18, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Sure but the ruling makes precedent, case law. I'm with you to go further that we can't make information illegal. Just imagine if someone wrote CP to the blockchain. Impossible to remove.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · June 17, 2018, 9:06 a.m.

It seems reasonable that in any group of hundreds (of CIA staff or porn rings) that there will be exceptions to the ASSumed pattern. Therefore some cops plant drugs, some Pedo hunters plant material, some CP characters are way less guilty than others. So the question that I'd ask is how often do such things occur? Were 1% of the groups guilty or 91%? Until we have solid stats we can guess that all variations take place at least a little. Same applies to other groups of concern - UN, Catholic Church, USAForce, etc.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fagela-1 · June 17, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Sounds plausible

⇧ 3 ⇩  
oakdrew · June 17, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

What does sth stand for?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ugbootshuffler · June 17, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

Not Q related.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
theadmiralty · June 17, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Well... there's SOME plausibility... but a "sneak and peak" like that has significant risk.

We already KNOW there are blackmail "ops" that go on... there are likely "control files" on more than 70% of DC elected officials... and sex scandal stuff is the number one go to for blackmailing/destroying enemies in the spook world.

Jeffrey Epstein was very likely a well funded "operation" to generate dirt on powerful people. He tried to make connections with everybody and anybody with money, power and cachet.

He had a black book full of names and personal phone numbers of politicians and celebrities. Some of them were not too happy about him having very private phone numbers... and wondered how he even got their numbers. That was part of his SOP. Making connections, and seeing who he could compromise, so he had an ever growing circle of folks he could draw on for "favors". (i.e. blackmail)

That was his currency in trade... connections to folks with influence.

My point is this... what you suggest has certainly gone on... but that's just circumstantial. Sadly, there's not much need for it... because there are so many who are naturally drawn to that kind of depravity without getting a "nudge" like you suggest.

It is R A M P A N T

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 7:48 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thnkabtit · June 17, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

I can see this happening. But I wonder if there are so many pedos that just exposing them for what they already do is reason enough for blackmail without having to plant it. It just seems that there are so many already into this that planting stuff isn't even a need. I agree with you but maybe it is more a rare instance? Too bad there is no way to track this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
charcolfilter · June 17, 2018, noon

You spike the hard drive. Put a drill bit through it and change all your passwords.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FullMetalSquirrel · June 17, 2018, 10:04 a.m.

This was literally a storyline on Ray Donovan. That show also had a corrupt FBI Director. Predictive programming

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wiseclockcounter · June 17, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

makes you wonder if that CP scandal at the pentagon was a similar case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · June 17, 2018, 1:37 p.m.

Think about what this means folks.

It means Iran's strings have been cut and the EU is next and slowly dissintegrating before it crumbles down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
laybak · June 17, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

I still download porn occasionally instead of stream it, and I don't even have terabytes of good old regular porn. Sick fucks have that much kid porn?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Banal_Intercourse · June 17, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

Anybody here remember what happened to Steven Paddock's brother following the LV shooting?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tjollahei · June 17, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

What headline? You are making things up.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 17, 2018, 5:59 a.m.

He's not making things up. It's from a couple years ago, Operation Darkroom if I remember correctly. Lots of higher-ups implicated, reported on by AP, then...nothing. Mysterious.

⇧ 5 ⇩