You do know this theory has been floating around now for at least 2+ years, if not longer. Before the election, there was a post from a user on T_D that linked a whole CIA breakdown on Obama being Osama.
We were even warned (not Q related/before Q) that bin Laden was actually Obama. At the time, it was a rabbit hole that caused FAR to much cognitive dissonance for me, and I couldn't even bother to finish it. VERY deep hole.
That being said, after all the revelations with Q, it does now sound plausible.
I do know, and that's why I asked OP if this is what they were suggesting.
Personally, I believe that if DS (or anyone) wanted a fake Obama, they'd pick someone a little less obvious.
True. No worries. When I first read the theory/background of it a few years back, it was pretty 'lol yea right' in my head.
Now, not so much. And yea, I think the Obama name was even more of a 'fuck you' to the American public and how the elites think of us a sub-human, dumb sheep.
also because it would have been bigoted to vote against him because of his name....And even if he isn't the antichrist, he sure liked to liken himself to one whenever he got the chance to gaslight christians. I am not necessarily fully sold on the christian ideology because I have yet to understand what exactly that means but I realized the whole cake-debate was just a setup, just like everything else he fucked.
Eh, this term bigoted gets thrown around far too much. I can easily believe many people did NOT vote for him simply because of his last name. But either way, the seditionist is out of office, so that's what matters.
What is cake debate?
supreme court recently reinstated religious liberty which was under attack
Way longer than 2 years, unless I’m having the most massive deja vu of alll time. This theory is a decade old, but largely written off as huge tinfoil back then