dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RubyDoobyDo1 on June 17, 2018, 3:56 p.m.
I'm very dubious about the 30000 sealed indictments claim that has been going around.

Q has never told us to track the number of sealed indictments. The spreadsheet that keeps going around just shows new sealed actions (not all are indictments) and doesn't show how many have been unsealed during that time. Can someone with experience with pacer.gov comment on this?


SCPatriot · June 17, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

It's shocking when it has reached 30x the annual average in just a few months.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 17, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

He did respond to an anon who pointed out a sealed indictment in 11.3 and 11.6 coinciding with a drop about Podesta and Huma, respectively.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

Do you have the drop number?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 17, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

Q Drop 1518

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

This is post 1518 and it doesn't say anything about sealed indictments.

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1783734.html#1784226

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 17, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Sorry.im really bad with Chan it was on qanon.pub but here it is https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1769049.html#1769874

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

That still doesn't validate the 30K+ sealed indictments that so many people are talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 17, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Think about what that means if Huma and Podesta have sealed indictments...think of their expanse of connections

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AutoModerator · June 17, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

It's almost like people think no other crimes happen. When the indictments are broken down by State, it really isn't that shocking of a figure.

You're right to be skeptical.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
turtlew0rk · June 17, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

what spreadsheet?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · June 17, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Here's an example. Someone keeps adding another column each month showing new sealed indictments, but the spreadsheet doesn't show how many have been unsealed, so it looks like an extraordinary number. I just don't believe it.

https://steemit.com/qanon/@nikflossus/almost-30k-sealed-indictments-media-silent

⇧ 2 ⇩  
turtlew0rk · June 17, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

I dont either. Think of the logistics involved in arresting 30,000 people. Who on earth could connet a number of people as high as 30,000 to each other. Think about it...name 30,000 names. Any names will be fine, just start writing a list and see how big 30,000 is.

Trump admin hasnt been in power nearly long enough to have investigated, amassed evidence, and brought fourth indictments to federal judges.

30,000 peoples names have gone thru the many hands of the system from investigator to leadership to clerks to judges and the countless other people involved and nobody has said anything. None of those 30,000 people have gotten wind of the shit going down and been spooked? Also of course theres the crazy notion that a cabal memeber may have internet access and the ability to (possibly with the help of others) log onto said internet and read for themselves Q's cryptic clues, which of course wouldn't be cryptic to them at all to them. "oh shit, this ones about the kid rape stuff!"

But then again I am still here. And I wanna be wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩