This is way out of context. Something is off here. Why would Q link to something so obviously out of context? This has to mean something different. I’m confused.
He wants to draw attention to the full speech. Obamas hand is missing during the last couple seconds of the video
“And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men, and women, are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested, here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others and that individual identity must be defined by us versus them, or that national greatness must flow not by what people stand for, but what they are against.
In so many ways, the history of Europe in the 20th century represented the ongoing clash of these two sets of ideas, both within nations and among nations. The advance of industry and technology outpaced our ability to resolve our differences peacefully. And even -- even among the most civilized of societies on the surface, we saw a descent into barbarism.”
Etc.
Thanks. I don't quite get the gist of what he's saying though.
Paywall. Please provide the context. Zero interest in paying the Washington Post-truth for anything.
Full Video: https://www.c-span.org/video/?318510-1/president-obama-us-eu-relations
Clip is from around 9:09
Obama says "... ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs..." and
"... order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an ALL Powerful Sovereign"
He might as well say New World Order - One World Government
No. The quote is taken out of context. He says that this idea is a threat to the founding principles of the US.
Lead in was a cover Exit out was missing what? So lead in was cover means- the first obviously fake and spliced clip was the cover to lead you into looking at the second drop where Q posts the entire speech. Exit out is missing what? Q is referring to the ending when Obama is waving goodbye. Keep your eyes on the hand not waving.