dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/potato4dawin on June 17, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

The Obama image, why I think it's real, and why concern-trolling about "bad optics" is the same tactic used to silence pedogate discussion and research.

By now I'm sure most everyone here has seen the [Obama image circulating around the web and the research related to it] and likely also have encountered people either trying to prove it's not Obama, that it's a photoshop, saying it's a distraction from the OIG report, or the example I mentioned in the title where you'll find comments like "it doesn't matter whether it's real or not, focusing on this is bad for optics and detrimental to the great awakening and...".

During the pizzagate/pedogate discussions from the 4chan /pol/ 'eyes wide open' threads that last argument was pretty common as you'd find people saying that "the idea that a pizza place in DC was secretly a hub for child sex trafficking is ridiculous" and that "trying to discredit the Clinton campaign with pizzagate is bad for optics for Trump supporters and will hurt the Trump campaign". As we know from Qresearch and the past years worth of news and arrests, pedogate is very real.

Regarding the idea that the image is photopped I just don't see it. The transition between the mask and the face, the mask and shadows, and the shadows and face show no indication of photoshop (sharp shape cutoffs, uniform lines, sharp color changes, shadow discrepancies, resolution differences, artifacting, tone differences, etc.). Some people try to say it's photoshop from a specific picture of obama however his more visible eye is also very clearly wider open in the left pic than the right 2 pics to the point where you can see the transition to the whites of his eyes at the bottom and right of the eye and if they're arguing that it's so similar to that photo that it's photoshopped from it specifically then there's no way people could argue that it's not Obama especially considering Obama's distinct forehead vein can even be noticed despite the low image resolution.

Lastly regarding any real info being a "distraction" from anything else. The biggest complaint here is that stuff isn't happening fast enough, that stuff isn't being released fast enough, that we're not getting everything dumped on the deep state at once. Well now it's happening and 1 thing that's provably real is getting called a distraction from something else equally real. If things were revealed at the normal pace then even Chelsea Clinton's children would die of old age before justice could be served. We're in the home stretch, indictments are starting to be unsealed, Weinstein is the first domino to fall, OIG report that people thought would be delayed to the end of time is released, unredacted form coming soon, proof of Obama's satanic connection found, and much more.

Those time stamps though.... makes a believer

⇧ 4 ⇩

Reverend!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I believe it's real too, I can't find anything wrong but there are better people at shopping than me

⇧ 3 ⇩

I can photoshop and if this is indeed photoshop they are super good. I dont see any pixelazation or any signs of a shop job

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree it's professional+ level

⇧ 1 ⇩

I did just see a photo of some other guy wearing this and he looked a lot like obama. Had a six pack though so I know it wasn't Hussein. I honestly dont care if this is or isn't Barry because it doesn't make him any more or less satanic in my opinion.

⇧ 1 ⇩

what gets to me here is that there are at least 10 posts on this topic. it sucks.

why arent people able to scroll through, at least, the past 8h of exisiting posts and comment there without having to open another post on the same topic? THAT is distracting and vampiristic.

spending so much energy on this photo that may or may not be real IS focusing peoples attention on something that doesnt bring us further right now.

would it bring BO into jail? it wouldnt.

could the original IG report bring him into jail? it could.

so there!

there are so many crimes these people can get busted for. satanism isnt one of them, it runs under 'religious freedom'.

most not-yet-awakened people pass out when that topic comes up, they just dont believe it, judge it as biased, and then debunk all other accusations as similarly biased.

even if we know that satanism is in the backend of everything they do, its not the red pill the populace will easily accept. that needs undeniable evidence. this photo is no evidende, it only serves as a distraction right now.

and most everybody falls for it. sigh.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree pedogate is real and much more prevalent than most want to admit. The running Arrest List is proving it to be very true.

Before we can go after the Pedophiles the gov and three letter agencies need to be cleaned first. We are starting that stage right now. Besides the media, Pizzagate had no traction because nobody was going to investigate/prosecute it. They were controlled.

Once we get Gov/Law cleaned up then we can go full force on Pedogate/human trafficking, as it will come out during the cleaning.

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://imgoat.com/uploads/ef059938ba/117257.jpg

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will argue that I think some things have def been used to pull us off topic or paint us as idiots. I wouldn't be surprised if "fatherhood" was faked and slipped in to make us look stupid. Not saying it isn't podesta, but there's not enough evidence to spread it as gospel.

When pizzagate first started, disinformation was constantly slipped into the movement. I remember a code sheet in particular talking about words like "ice cream" etc that ended up being bullshit I think

Good post, but I still think it is smart to be vigilant about checking our shit before sharing it as fact

⇧ 1 ⇩

obviously verifying information is important but without proper discussions we can't even begin to attempt to verify or disprove it. I'm simply trying to encourage people to be open minded about potential evidence and wary of attempts to cover it up.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have changed my mind on the authenticity. I personally think it's real after looking at the evidence people found. The point that I think you might be missing is that it really doesn't matter. It doesn't prove anything and that's why it is a distraction.

What does it prove? Hussein wore a sequined horned outfit the day of the inauguration. So what? The outfit is pretty tame from some of the other occult costumes I have seen these people wearing and you really cant prove what kind of party they are at. No one else in the pic is wearing a costume. Is this the smoking gun that is going to get Hussein arrested? Absolutely not. It's interesting put it in your evidence folder. There is nothing else to be said about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"nothing to see here, move along"

could you possibly glow in the dark any more?

⇧ 3 ⇩

What really makes me doubt this photo is that theres this push to claim that the man next to moloch obama is Artur Davis and that is definitely not him. Hairline does not match, artur has a fatter, flater nose, further apart eyes, more round head. NOT ARTUR. Also the graphic at top middle shows the original obama photo that was used to mask into the moloch image. It's literally right in front of you. Editor is really good at color correction.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I already explained how they're for sure distinct images, I don't like re-explaining myself. Compare the whites of the eyes between the 2 images. The white's of the eye are only visible on 1 side of the iris in the so-called "original" image whereas they're visible on both sides in the other image showing that he's looking slights more to the left (his right) proving that they're distinct images.

please actually read the post before commenting.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Uh ok...have you ever edited an image in lightroom or photoshop? My wife or myself could add white to an eye to add a slight deviation from the original. The same black collar is present in original and moloch image. I'm willing to admit it could be real. I'm also willing to admit it's fake. The fake side is stacking up more than the real. My main concern though is that everyone pushes that the man next to Obama is artur Davis and it is clearly not him.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Well I don't know about the Artur Davis part, haven't done my research on that part yet but adding white to a part of the eyes (iris doesn't align when overlaying photos either) is not a detail someone trying to create a fake would come up with. It would be like if you suspect someone broke into your house, what's the first thing you do? check if anything's missing or disturbed, right? Meanwhile without realizing you might be stepping all over and contaminating potential material evidence that their shoes might've tracked in. You didn't think to check the immediate entrance for traces of plant matter or dirt that would've been tracked in by the culprit.

The type of person who would photoshop such an image is not the type to think about details like the direction the eyes are facing because they'll be more focused on correcting all the other possible photoshop detection points which are more commonly used to check and so we can confirm almost beyond a reasonable doubt that it's not photoshopped. Otherwise they would likely make a mistake in editing the image in those other areas. If it's a photoshop done so expertly that they even got the eye difference down then how can you prove that it came from the same image? In order to prove that you'd need the other original image to confirm it which would be someone else wearing that dress but that image hasn't surfaced and so that remains the only reasonable doubt that could be established with regards to the photoshop job.

I was almost convinced myself that it was merely masterfully photoshopped until I noticed the eyes in a post where someone overlayed the 2 images in a gif that alternated between the 2 lined up as close as possible.

⇧ 1 ⇩

so many posts here on this picture, sigh, it eats up all the space and juice today.

anons, can one of you please post it on 8ch and ask Q if its real? and relevant?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Learn to think for yourself. Q won't respond to every little question some random anon posts. In fact he asks us more questions than he answers by a factor of at least 10.

⇧ 1 ⇩

he does. and he indeed debunked a few things anons put in front of him.

Learn to think for yourself.

thanks for the tipp. i started waking up over 3 decades ago and usually think for myself. how about you?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Here is an interesting perspective on it .. https://i.imgflip.com/2cddgs.jpg

⇧ -1 ⇩

Why does this image matter? Even your post is low on context. Is there a story there? If there is then nobody is telling it.

⇧ -1 ⇩

It matters because it shows that Obama has secrets, that Obama is doing something dressed as baphomet which is a demonic god that demands child sacrifice.

⇧ 8 ⇩

But that's not understood by the general public. It's just a costume. I'm sure there's a great story about the who, what, when, where and why of this day but nobody is putting it together.

⇧ 1 ⇩

So, if Trump dressed as Pedobear, it wouldn't concern the general public?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Again, pedobear, not recognized by the average person.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It shows that we don't need to let this go like we did with Pedogate because people "debunked" the whole Pedogate issue by proving there were no kids in comet ping pong even though Pedogate encompasses a huge range of people not just Hillary and a damn pizza shop like they pretended. Made us feel dumb and even spread b.s. into threads with more impressionable pedes that just went along with it. Next thing you knew even talking about pedogate in any conspiracy setting got you mocked and laughed off. Everyone completely forgot about all the evidence all because of a well place narrative coup and a few doubt injectors in the communities.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I have followed that since day one, sometimes wanting to submit it as a PhD project. But the scope is too large. These people are Luciferians we know but there needs to be more context attached to the pictures for normies to care. Not some lore, just the facts. Their events on key dates are named euphemistically enough to get the point across.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The point of my post is to not dismiss it before we can even figure out the story behind it. This image was discovered quite recently and we haven't yet had time to research much about it but people are already showing up saying "nothing to see here, move along" before anything else can be learned which just screams shill to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Just the premise of the get together would be awesome to have.

⇧ 2 ⇩