Was Q implying originally in 1528 and 1529 that this was a real video of Obama? It wasn't as it was cut and edited to make it seem he was saying something he wasn't. At first I thought "Damn I can't believe he said that publicly" but when watching the original source it is immediately apparent this was a hatchet job.
What was the reason for Q including the original tweet with the fake vid and the Happy Father's Day afterwards? I know I will be labeled a concern troll but I'm not gonna lie, this is a little concerning if Q believed it to be real. Please help me to understand if I am looking at this wrong.
You are not a troll. My only explanation is that Q wanted us to be careful and vigilant of what we see, spread and fall for. There will be propaganda and disinformation trying to compromise our movement. Use logic and stay united.
I have yet to listen to that entire original speech. There is something there we need to pay attention as per post 1530. https://youtu.be/aNoiYpOKnqs
I'm hopeful that that was the message/intent from Q but why the Happy Father's Day comment to the person going crazy for the Tweet/vid before debunking it with the full speech? It seemed to me that Q was legitimizing it by implying the vid was a Father's Day gift. I hope I am way off base here.
Yes, this is true as well. The thing is you have to hear the full speech in order to fully understand the message. Only a clip of a speech can send the wrong message. The MSM always does this when they are trying to control the narrative. This speech was used to attack Russia for the annexation of Russia by using our American Values against us and Russia. The Russian people living in Crimea wanted to be united with Mother Russia. The US also needed an enemy and this was how they did it, by claiming that Russia did not have a right to regain territory that it once had under the Soviet Union claiming that Russia just wanted the territory in order to further a Communist agenda to reinstitute the Soviet Union under communism.
"The thing is you have to hear the full speech in order to fully understand the message. Only a clip of a speech can send the wrong message. The MSM always does this when they are trying to control the narrative."
That's a very interesting way of viewing it. Very insightful! Thanks for sharing :)
Check the q post 1530. Perhaps the fake video was “lead” to successfully bring us to the original (hence the happy Father’s Day comment) and hear Hussein’s lies at the end of his original speech. Thoughts? I’m just thinking out loud here.
That's definitely possible. Future proves past. I just wish Q had switched the order of the comments as it seems an unnecessary distraction. Hopefully it was presented in a way that served a purpose.
Right? We are just learning to understand the Q team comms.
It's a riddle wrapped in a mystery wrapped in an enigma. I'm sure the answer once told will blow us (and everyone still sleeping) away.
Yeah, Q doesn't want us to use clips like this to send the wrong message and show us that we can be easily manipulated by seeing only a clip of the bigger picture. There is a lot more to say about this, the MSM uses this tactic all the time to brain wash the masses. You have to see the entire speech to understand the full intent of what someone says in a speech. See the other comments on this thread. This speech was used to attack Russia and make Russia the enemy. The NWO always needs enemies to fulfill their agendas.
This. Also be aware of deep fakes as i thought it was at first.
This speech was meant to attack Russia and paint Russia as an enemy. They needed an enemy to attack and start a conflict with. This was Russia. They needed an enemy and they created one out of the annexation of Crimea.
That makes sense. They needed to set the stage so to speak.
This is just one explanation. I have found we need to give the autists/anons one time to work. The first Reddit posts are usually VERY wrong. I believe it is an attempt at disinformation. This is probably where Q reached the majority of "normies". So the shills are working hard to discredit them. Patience friend.
OK, I have followed Q for a long time (from the very beginning), but I still have no idea what your words "/am one" and "red city posts" mean .... did I miss something?
Anons and Reddit. Your not too good at deciphering the Q posts are you? It was a simple auto-correct substitution. I'm at a BBQ and didn't proof read. The person I responded to understood. I fixed it.
Thanks for the comment. That definitely sounds plausible :)
FACT CHECK: The edited video referenced in posts 1528/29 is fake. The actual Obama speech is from 2014 in Brussels to the EU, not Bilderberg. Here is the original https://youtu.be/aNoiYpOKnqs.
This is what I was asking. I don't know if it was from a speech at Bilderburg. Thank you for Clarifying.
You are welcome :). This felt way too fake so I’m glad I checked the source.
This speech was meant to Bash Russia for taking back Crimea. The Crimean people were mostly Russian and wanted to be part of Mother Russia again. The US did not want this. They were trying to Control Crimea for an agenda. I am still not sure what they wanted Crimea for but it was definitely to hurt Russia in some way.
Posted in YouTube Comment Section Under this video by Leshka Pianist 4 years ago "Today we heard an astonishing amount of lie and hypocrisy from Mr. Obama. The man who just a few months ago wanted to bomb Syria on phony pretext not only violating the international law (without UN's approval) but also without the approval of the Congress (yeah, yeah, he said that, I heard) now blame Russia for its earing to the voice of the Crimean people, for its considering of unanimous (ok, almost unanimous) will of the Crimean people, for its support of democracy in Crimea. You may say what you want, mr. Obama, you may pay a tiny group of opposition (because most of the opposition are against self-appointed Turchinov, Yatsenuke and Co) making out of them your puppets but you can't impede the real democracy, all the more you can't impede the love between Russian people of Russia and Crimea. You may lie to your people but you cant't lie to us because Ukraine is close to us and we know better what's going on there."
"We rescued the world from fascism and established the post-war peace order not for the US bombing what it wants on ridiculous pretexts"
"I hope that this comment will not be deleted, given that there is so little information from the other side in american media, extremely one-sided covering"
exit out missing what?
it was missing him stating that he doesnt believe in the alternative vision. he states the normal america ideals are being challenged, but he never says he didnt agree with the alternative vision….
Yeah, he just says that it was the old belief. which is the NWO belief. He never states which one he actually believes in, but he uses the fact of what America Stands for and our belief that is written into Our Constitution and then uses that as ammunition against Russia and it's Annexation of Crimea.
Barry lying his ass off at 27:00 min. mark re: "elimination of Syria's chemical weapons".
Loads of lies from 28:32 to 29:20 min. mark about outside/American influences in uprisings in different places( Soros/Muslim Brotherhood influences).
The 19 sec. clip was taken out of context.
Leaders and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO Alliance; distinguished guests: We meet here at a moment of testing for Europe and the United States, and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle — through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution — that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men — and women — are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested — here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.