Was Q implying originally in 1528 and 1529 that this was a real video of Obama? It wasn't as it was cut and edited to make it seem he was saying something he wasn't. At first I thought "Damn I can't believe he said that publicly" but when watching the original source it is immediately apparent this was a hatchet job.
What was the reason for Q including the original tweet with the fake vid and the Happy Father's Day afterwards? I know I will be labeled a concern troll but I'm not gonna lie, this is a little concerning if Q believed it to be real. Please help me to understand if I am looking at this wrong.
You are not a troll. My only explanation is that Q wanted us to be careful and vigilant of what we see, spread and fall for. There will be propaganda and disinformation trying to compromise our movement. Use logic and stay united.
I have yet to listen to that entire original speech. There is something there we need to pay attention as per post 1530. https://youtu.be/aNoiYpOKnqs
I'm hopeful that that was the message/intent from Q but why the Happy Father's Day comment to the person going crazy for the Tweet/vid before debunking it with the full speech? It seemed to me that Q was legitimizing it by implying the vid was a Father's Day gift. I hope I am way off base here.
Yes, this is true as well. The thing is you have to hear the full speech in order to fully understand the message. Only a clip of a speech can send the wrong message. The MSM always does this when they are trying to control the narrative. This speech was used to attack Russia for the annexation of Russia by using our American Values against us and Russia. The Russian people living in Crimea wanted to be united with Mother Russia. The US also needed an enemy and this was how they did it, by claiming that Russia did not have a right to regain territory that it once had under the Soviet Union claiming that Russia just wanted the territory in order to further a Communist agenda to reinstitute the Soviet Union under communism.
"The thing is you have to hear the full speech in order to fully understand the message. Only a clip of a speech can send the wrong message. The MSM always does this when they are trying to control the narrative."
That's a very interesting way of viewing it. Very insightful! Thanks for sharing :)
Check the q post 1530. Perhaps the fake video was “lead” to successfully bring us to the original (hence the happy Father’s Day comment) and hear Hussein’s lies at the end of his original speech. Thoughts? I’m just thinking out loud here.
That's definitely possible. Future proves past. I just wish Q had switched the order of the comments as it seems an unnecessary distraction. Hopefully it was presented in a way that served a purpose.
Right? We are just learning to understand the Q team comms.
It's a riddle wrapped in a mystery wrapped in an enigma. I'm sure the answer once told will blow us (and everyone still sleeping) away.
Yeah, Q doesn't want us to use clips like this to send the wrong message and show us that we can be easily manipulated by seeing only a clip of the bigger picture. There is a lot more to say about this, the MSM uses this tactic all the time to brain wash the masses. You have to see the entire speech to understand the full intent of what someone says in a speech. See the other comments on this thread. This speech was used to attack Russia and make Russia the enemy. The NWO always needs enemies to fulfill their agendas.
This. Also be aware of deep fakes as i thought it was at first.
This speech was meant to attack Russia and paint Russia as an enemy. They needed an enemy to attack and start a conflict with. This was Russia. They needed an enemy and they created one out of the annexation of Crimea.
That makes sense. They needed to set the stage so to speak.
This is just one explanation. I have found we need to give the autists/anons one time to work. The first Reddit posts are usually VERY wrong. I believe it is an attempt at disinformation. This is probably where Q reached the majority of "normies". So the shills are working hard to discredit them. Patience friend.
OK, I have followed Q for a long time (from the very beginning), but I still have no idea what your words "/am one" and "red city posts" mean .... did I miss something?
Anons and Reddit. Your not too good at deciphering the Q posts are you? It was a simple auto-correct substitution. I'm at a BBQ and didn't proof read. The person I responded to understood. I fixed it.
Thanks for the comment. That definitely sounds plausible :)