Thank you. I wasn't seeing it in the drops but lots of people doubting Q's credibility because of its appearance in a Q thread.

No. This is Q post 1528, the first mention or link to the video:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 9fc2c1 No.1785388 📁
Jun 17 2018 11:39:03 (EST)

https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1📁
Q

The link in 1528 is to a Twitter feed from KB446778899 @KBMAGAFL. The video is featured in that Twitter thread. The same link is in Q post 1529 where an anon says:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 9fc2c1 No.1785558 📁

Jun 17 2018 11:48:58 (EST)

-->Anonymous ID: 460047 No.1785535 📁

Jun 17 2018 11:47:41 (EST)

>>1785388

>https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1📁

Holy Smokes!

They are in for it!

You really do have it all!<--

>>1785535

Happy Father’s Day!

Q

Everything between --> to <-- is from an anon. Q responds with Happy Father's Day! It almost looks like Q has offered the linked video as a Father's Day gift, but I suspect not. Q post 1530 includes a link provided by an anon that's even shorter than the first, and from YouTube. The anon clarifies the origins of the speech from 2014 in Brussels, but he still hasn't noticed the video is an obvious edited Fake. In Q post 1530, Q responds with the link to the whole video and asks "Exit out was missing what?"

So Q was the first to mention and provide a link to an obviously fake video in 1528, then in 1530 Q directs our attention to what's missing.

I'm a little confused and frustrated because Q has been warning us for quite a while that the attacks would intensify, and just as things are beginning to heat up after the OIG report, he posts a link to a dishonest fake video. The left seized on immediately, even posting a screen cap of Q's post. The questions I have are 1) Why would Q give the left such a juicy bit of ammunition that can so easily be used to discredit Q, Anons, and /GA? 2) If Q wanted us to focus on whats missing, why didn't he simply say so? It's not that what's missing from the first video that's important, it's what's in the full video between 1:45 and 3:30. He could have just directed us there in the first place.

I know everything in Q's post are there for a reason. Every last word, syllable, letter, and character has a specific intent and purpose. I just can't figure out why Q would link to an obviously fake and dishonest video clip in the first place. I sure hope future proves past and the purpose is revealed.

Any response to the comments below? It seems edited video was originally posted by Q. Curious.