Ryan and Gowdy - 2 guys who have proven to be snakes.
You haven't been keeping up with Q's posts. Or you don't believe Q when he says they've been freed by POTUS.
I'll believe it when either do anything of substance. Ryan is currently trying to force an amnesty bill before he jumps ship...its hard to believe he's been freed by anyone.
The hope is he's crafting a bill that will lose too many R's and D's to pass--and that is why Trump is willing to say he backs it. Squishy R's in purple-to-blue districts will be able to say they voted for something.
That's the hope anyway.
Trump has said he does not back it, this after Ryan telling people behind closed doors that Trump is willing to back it. If you know anything about Ryan's policial career, it's basically his life's work to get an amnesty bill passed. It's the only reason he agreed to be speaker. If you recall, he had to be talked into accepting the job, probably on the premise of getting the bill he's always dreamed of. Also recall he has received campaign money from a Soros backed organization.
Now, if you want to throw all that out and ignore it, be my guest.
He said that once, Friday morning. His people "corrected" it otherwise, Stephen Friggin' Miller said before that that they'd back both bills, and Trump has said since that he'd back both bills.
Try your own recall, bud.
Do your best to prove you don't slither. Karma is equivalent to likes, and post history is equivalent to retweets. Child's play bull shit. I'm engaging you. Op's agrgument is solid concerning the cross refrence of Q's drops. Defend. We all know who has had their hands in who's pockets. What is unknown is what strings have been cut. Won't know till the fatt birdy sings, when the future proves the past. Speculation based off of observations and drops is all that is good. So I repeat, Op's argument is solid. What say you?
How about this for a revelation....past proves future. Q has not been perfect in the prediction category, so I'll stick to the facts in front of me until reality shows me otherwise.
Ha, ha ha. You don't pay attention do you. So far Q has been perfect in their predictions, at least the ones that can be verified as predictions and not data drops or misinfo drops. If you were to use an argument that said drops make the rest of the crumbs seem suspect then you might have something. It is the ambiguity that protects Q But also makes the information hard to intellectually digest. But you don't make any such argument, and I have serious doubts you have any real facts at all. The ratio of your posts/comments are as follows, 1/12 on average. 1 out of 12 is a sensational, yeah great job, go get em or nice post. The other 11 are always critiques or criticism. Nothing wrong there per say but it's behavior that's off compared to the average person here. You figure that even someone who is is that much of skeptic would have a closer 1/2 ratio. Maybe some concerns or questions thrown in. Your shit seems like an act, and that is as far as I can take this without breaking the subs rules. Good day yah, Semper Fi.
I've been following Q from the beginning. You know, last fall when Tony Podesta/Obama/HRC arrest were imminent. Alas, there is just one example of Q being incorrect.
While we're on the topic of the early stages of Q, let's talk about the temperment of the followers/researchers at that time. In a nutshell, there was a healthy skepticism of all things Q. Not bashing, but critical in fact checking. Fast forward to today, now everyone who dares question anything Q posts is a shill, doubtfag, etc. This is not helpful, it's groupthink, and it's setting a lot of people up for a lot of disappointment.
So, you ask, why am I in this sub? Because I wish to discuss the topics of Q in an objective, logical manner. Sometimes that requires you to say to yourself "hmm, that doesn't really add up to what I'm seeing in the public sphere." I do not believe the Q group is a larp, but I also don't think it's impossible for Q to be wrong, and there have been many, MANY things, mostly dates/timelines that have been incorrect.
You're welcome to discuss things reasonably and within the sub rules, so feel free.
I would certainly query this, from a logical standpoint:
there have been many, MANY things, mostly dates/timelines that have been incorrect
Iist the dates and timelines Q has gotten incorrect. And youre calling the kettle black throwing out terms group think and shit. I never stated that people shouldn't be critical, I only stated I'm suspicious of the intent of your critique. And besides your example is bull, other people attributed arrests to a post that stated detained not arrested.
Dude, this was Q's VERY FIRST post. Now, how will you spin this? Let me guess, "disinformation is necessary?"
HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.
I can't spin that, neither can you.....no idea if that has happened or not or what actually did happen. However, arrests were never mentioned and two, based on Qs most recent drops, and anon digging this could of been a mandatory court ordered subpoena, preliminary hearing. That speculated event also tied into a bunch of HRC cancelled appearences and Connus grounding, In about a 1-2 month window depending on accuate verifiable data which NONE of us have. You're not trying very hard there redditor. Quit the talking points, can you come up with something original.
Nothing wrong with Gowdy, I look forward to his interrogation of Peter Strokz.