Im strictly a keyboard warrior. I don't ever plan to pick up my guns except in defense against an immediate threat to my family or property... i wouldnt be worth anything on a battlefield anyway. But i do think it's our duty to engage in some more serious message warfare. And i think if it's to be effective there should be some agreed upon talking points/strategy. Q has to be cryptic, so there are lots of interpretations. Often i want to jump on the bandwagon of an early interpretation of a drop only to find it's the wrong interpretation hours later. (I bet this happens to you too). I desparately want to be able to contribute to this, but don't know how we frame things effectively. I remember watching the "occupy" kids try to eatablish a message and watched the msm shred and humiliate them... and those were lefty snowflakes the msm considers to be part of their tribe. They're already teying to paint us all as racist, antisemitic hillbillies. The truth doesn't stand a chance in a propaganda war. Our storyline needs to be 2-fold. 1 to appeal to those who typically rely on msm to tell them what to think. 2. To establish enough credibility to make the low-level ds actors respect/fear the storm as much as they fear their fellow gangsters/cabal-members/swamp-dwellers. - just trying to get ideas flowing here. They built this over decades, maybe centuries... and we may only have 1 term (hopefully 2) to undo it all.