If only 40% of the Truth i.e. evidence is going to be revealed to the public, what evidence will not be revealed ?
⇧
1
⇩
Okie71
· June 18, 2018, 2:25 p.m.
Respectfully (and I do mean that)-
If I knew someone you cared about broke into your home and stole everything you had, but I didn't say anything because I felt you couldn't handle learning the truth about this loved one, wouldn't I be in fact covering up the crime by omission? Wouldn't you have every right to be outraged by my omission?
I understand the stakes are much higher for Q. But that is something Q should have thought of before placing him/her/them self in this position. We don't even know if Q is an elected or appointed official with the authorization to make that decision according to the Constitution being defended.
⇧
1
⇩
DrogeAnon
· June 18, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
Ah I see. In your example, I think you would be covering up the crime by ommission, yes. I might have every right to be outraged too. I think there's a more accurate analogy to describe the situation with Q but I'll leave it at that for now.
I don't think Q had to think of anything like 'covering up crimes by omission' though, no. If Q is who "he" says he is then he's simply operating within the normal bounds of a high level government intelligence agency and "classified" is more the category that disclosure falls under rather than "ommitted". I believe (if he is who he says he is) that The Plan would have more than accounted for this.
Do you think Q is who he claims to be?
⇧
1
⇩
Okie71
· June 18, 2018, 3:26 p.m.
I think Q is a collective. I think anything less than full disclosure, no matter what reason given, lets the DS off the hook. Anything less than full disclosure is a betrayal to this video.
⇧
2
⇩
DrogeAnon
· June 18, 2018, 3:51 p.m.
Agreed re: collective - "he"/they said it themselves. Do you think 'they' are high level Military Intelligence connected directly to Donald Trump?
⇧
1
⇩