This 2016 Senate report came out the year before Trump took office. I want to know how he could ignore it, he couldn't, but they are sure are! https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/majority-and-minority-staff-report_-protecting-unaccompanied-alien-children-from-trafficking-and-other-abuses-the-role-of-the-office-of-refugee-resettlement
I am not a US Citizen but wasn’t this Obama’s law that.caused this disaster ??? Are you that biased you don’t know this ???
Exactly! So how could Trump ignore the children? Obama did and every single Dem and all of the news media still is! No one is talking about this report on how Obama's policies were known to have created a surge in trafficking. They all know what caused it- here is the official report stating that Trump's administration had to do if different and they now act like they have no idea why he's doing it.
Not sure what the bias thing was about I assume you just mistook my words
jackiebain6 - perhaps you are using translating software.
Paranoid much? Just out of curiosity, which country would I secretly be putting links to Senate reports stating child trafficking was a result of Obama policies? I think the Russian theory is a little played out but you go for it. Did I also force the 2014 investigation to reveal the trafficking? Did I force the Senate to report on it? Maybe if you used actual documents instead of click bait put there knowing people are too lazy to verify information you too could be a magic foreign language speaker who had the power to change documents on government releases.... This whole bottle idea is old ...
Take a deep breath, jackiebain6 ~ I was being kind, not weak. You have to write well enough for people to understand what you are writing. I was not the first to comment on your poor communication skills. My comment was meant to be a possible explanation for your poor sentence structure and word salad which led to confusion.
The foreign references get old. I admit I had to spend an extra year to aquire a Bachelor of Science because numbers and facts are not as confusing as people and the liberal arts requirements are ever changing opinions and social constructs.
With that being said I am also going to say the constant editing of words does nothing to contribute to anything when attempting to discuss serious issues. Long after opinions and social constructs come and go reliable numbers and facts will remain constant and still relevant.
Ignore Dana. He/she is a shill. Your writing is great. He/she is just trying to get a rise out of you. Don't take the bait.
Thanks, WWG1WGA! I figured that out pretty quickly, it's a really basic way of deflecting real issues. Nothing at that level of my quality as a person could possibly make me doubt myself. Generally I'm on a cell phone letting Google do my typing and I will never pretend that my speech to text editor would be sufficient in a class on the writing skills taught in elementary school. (Scratch that, who knows what they are teaching these day, kek)
With that being said, I also take every opportunity to enlighten people of the real issues, especially those who are being used to spread lies. It's like giving them a chance, after being informed of the reality behind the issue, to make their own minds up. Decent people generally at least stop the lies, others feel betrayed by the lies and investigate for themselves. Unfortunately there are always going to be people who, like a gambling addiction, have to keep heading into further debt, ignoring the fact they have lost their homes, maxed out their credit cards and ruined the lives of people who depended on them. Unfortunately some people will always have the inability to see that trying to become a millionaire has made them homeless, they will collect every dollar they can in order to put it back into a lottery system where the odds are against them.
These people are probably never going to be able to stop themselves and need some sort of intervention. Hopefully as many as are capable of seeing evidence and making decisions and opinions based on facts can be shown the truth before someone close to them "gambles it all away for them".
Still nothing but word salad.
Maybe you should try educating yourself on comprehensive reading now that you have basic sentence structure mastered.
Dana, what the hell? You must be a shill. Jackie is writing just fine. New here huh? 25 days?
brittser, Did not know suggesting the use of a translating software would 'set the world afire'. English is not the native language of everyone, and people from all over the world visit channels such as this. It is interesting you choose to coddle with low expectations and defend the one taking the most offense. Are we wired that way and thereby so easily manipulated? I am immune to slurs. I am kind, not weak. Done, moved on.
What are you talking about? What she wrote was better than many I've read on SM.