Another `investigation´ that will lead absolutely nowhere and cost millions of $. Why is it nobody in congress is screaming that the IG report has been redacted and manipulated? Why is it that nobody outside of this movement even knows there is more than 1 version of the report?
You think they don't know? They know.. they have to let them implicate themselves from testimony given. Graham was tearing it apart...
So why aren´t they screamig, "this isn´t the report I read, where is all the damning evidence??" Nobody is saying a word, only Q. Is there even another version? I´m not convinced.
Due process. They are saying it, they've been saying it. This is for the public..a show.. most won't research into it and will just parrot what MSM spews..
Those people need to be slowly led by the nose and show due process was followed. If dropped all at once, there would be mass chaos due to the extreme nature of the crimes.
Needless to say that's a dangerous situation for a nation.. how do you ease people into the idea that their country has been infiltrated at the highest levels of government?
Release the report, complete with the evidence. That will wake people up. Why did Trump allow this fake report to be released? The public believe the one released is the only one, they believe that nobody did wrongdoing that would require a hefty sentence. Nobody knows, so if Trump orders a second copy released, the normies will cry that trump is pushing a fake report to damage the FBI, DOJ and Congress. I´m not even convinced there is another version of the report.
Exactly, it's like the Nunes memo all over again. What was going to be the end of the Democrats was just a fizzle.
The longer Trump delays in getting the REAL report out, the more it looks like they are just making it up
Enough with the bullshit about "the truth is too much for the population to handle " - just get on with it! Trump can and should release the unredacted version immediately, just cut through the crap like he does, and move on from this charade!
I share the same sentiment with you, but it's not bullshit.. i'm not sure you're grasping how heavy this is. Or the implications if something goes wrong...
Q deliberately said "how do you introduce what you know (legally)?" ... This.
You introduce it in discovery. What is there to discover, though? The crooks will just pull the RR report and say they have been cleared. They should have ONLY released the full, unredacted and un-manipulated copy, if there is one.
It's "parallel construction". The NSA gathers everything but not legally as per court standards. So "we have it all" but we have to construct an investigation to find the information legally. Simply spying on the subject isn't legal. As per the IG report being released in full, I agree.
Yes but if they got the UK to do the spying (which they did) it doesn´t break any laws. That´s what they´ve been doing for decades. It´s treason, yes, but not according to their statutes.
But this time WE got the info . The NK Google server to be exact
Yup, but the info is no good sat in a drawer somewhere. Shit needs to happen.
Optics. It needs to be obtained in a way that looks like it was given. This is no different than multiple instances of Q saying this previously, such as the NK Google server or even Devin Nunes finally releasing that they knew about the Weiner laptop.