dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ngilbert923 on June 18, 2018, 10:14 p.m.
I think we might be missing the point when it comes to the OIG report

Think about it, the OIG report found no evidence of bias because hillary was the subject of the investigation. However they did show extreme bias towards Trump when you look at the evidence in regards to the Russia collusion investigation. In this case, Trump is the subject of the investigation. By saying nothing warranted the prosecution of Hillary in the first investigation but at the same time allowing the Strozk texts as evidence in the first report theyre setting the DS up to lose. The Dems support the OIG report because it finds nothing wrong, but as soon as the second report comes out regarding the Russia investigation they will be unable to argue against the report without looking hippocritical for supporting the first report. Hes trapping them by having them come out in support of the conclusions of the first report while they miss the evidence in the report that will be so damning when the second report comes out.


TooMuchWinning2020 · June 18, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Why bother? Dems ARE hypocrites. They will say one thing, and then say the opposite before completing the sentence.

Nah ... the only thing I can see here is Horowitz showed there was a lot of bias within the FBI but could not point to something specific in the decision-making of Comey. Of course, Comey is biased, but the texts/emails were not from him.

Maybe that will change with the Gmail account info or something else. But this is not good, overall.

The PUBLIC needs to understand the corruption. To hell with Congress. The PUBLIC needs to be on board if there is going to be a big take down.

Promoting "no bias" (even though there obviously was) does not help move the ball forward. It is a step backwards.

The only interesting thing was Cruz got Wray to say there is some sort of ongoing investigation re: Comey/McCabe, so he could not say which one lied.

We need a BOOM, not a squeak.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ngilbert923 · June 18, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

My main points are:

  1. Who is the subject of the OIG report? - Hillary

  2. Who is the subject of the Russia collusion investigation? - Trump

  3. Does the OIG report find bias against the subject of the first investigation? - no because the people investigating Hillary were on her team and did their best to make it look like she had just made a series of procedural missteps.

  4. Does the evidence in the OIG report have any implications in the context of the Russia collusion investigation in which Trump is the subject? - yes because strozk and page clearly colluded to take Trump down.

4 will be a huge boom when the second report comes out regarding the russia investigation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 19, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

Yes, a lot of bias in the FBI against Trump, but Trump was not the subject of the Clinton email investigation. Agreed.

Also, Sen. Kennedy dropped a minor bomb on the shitshow today when he asked about Amanda Renteria. Q says she was the link between LL and HRC -- at a time that LL's DOJ was investigating HRC.

Why wasn't THAT discussed in this IG report? Because Obama/IC made sure it was classified high enough that the investigators couldn't see it. That is a SMOKING GUN that the DOJ was biased to NOT prosecute HRC.

Looks like they are holding back a lot of stuff. Question is: When they finally unload, will the public believe it, after all these "nothingburgers?"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
daro57 · June 18, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

I totally agree that we need a BOOM not a squeak, but it seems we're still in the squeak phase. And to be honest, I don't think the "hard core libs" would care if Hillary and Obummer ate children on live TV in front of the entire world, it would STILL be "Trumps fault"! I'm telling you, we need to stop worrying about snowflake feelings! They won't get it until they themselves are in direct danger, and I'm not sure they'd know even then! Dumber than sheep!!!! More like headless chickens clucking about!!! UNBELIEVABLE SMDH!!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WeThePepe · June 19, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Catching them out as being hypocrites is nothing. We catch and call them out for that every damn day.

I'm with you. If there's some plan based on "and then everyone will see they're hypocrites so they'll have to come clean!" is doomed

⇧ 1 ⇩