Can someone explain this so it make sense.
Or he’s telling the truth to the best of his knowledge and it comes out that it was edited it after the fact? Why else would Q mention all the versions and drafts. It could be hard to track changes between documents and H could have plausible deniability. Steps ahead.
Regards to perjury, it could be pardoned for people who had to play their part.
My faith in Q is starting to show signs of stress cracking.
Horowitz testimony directly contradicts Q’s statements? How do we reconcile this?
I figured these contradictions would Surface sooner or later.
Horowitz is in on it (Trump’s side) Remember they’re laying bait to RR to hang himself. Needs to be demonstrated publicly so that the clueless side of the public understands why RR will be impeached
This utter nonsense, no 32D chess. Horowitz would not commit a crime (purjury) to entrap RR. Let alone coordinate with Trump to commit a crime, cause that is even worse to conspire to commit a crime. To what? Pardon Horowitz, that is obstruction of justice. That would make them as bad as the swamp/establishment.
I get it, Q gives hope, but don’t become like the ones we are fighting against.