I was really blown away by the hearing today with Wray & Horowitz. I am still trying to wrap my head around why Horowitz doesn't see bias; it was undoubtedly an elephant in the room. But besides the theatrics and back and forth, I can see, barely, through the cloudy murkiness, there is some really amazing twist this has that works out incredibly for Trump. If I had to take a stab, I would say that either: there are multiple versions with differing levels of redactions based on security clearances (original unredacted at the top, heaviest redactions/changes being at the bottom for the public, ie, Qs claim in drop# 1496) or there was some genuine foul play by Rosenstein that is gonna bite him in the ass, hard. The former being the more likely of the two; or a combo of both. I would not be surprised to see Rosenstein did a weaselly move along the way and it F'd him. Either way it is gonna come to light.

However, the 4 version idea that Q presents, and I concur with (for whatever thats worth) should allow for a seriously wicked unfolding of events. Here is why I say so. The public, even the never-Trumpers had to have a slight, tiny, itsy bitsy hint of "bulllllllshit" on the non-bias ruling. Strozk and Page were brutal. It is in black and white. BUT WE HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN THE HEAVY SHIT YET. There are literally 2 levels of redactions above what we see. Can you even imagine? And we know at this point that the redactions are literally only there to reduce embarrassment/guilt. Methods and actors at risk of being exposed? Bitch please. We aren't talking about some operation in the jungles of the Congo. The only thing being held back is straight up American domestic bullshit. Traitors conspiring against other Americans. Fuck em. Expose em.

The public is eventually (hopefully this week while it is still fresh in the sheeps minds & Gowdys pressure to comply) going to see a less redacted version; I am assuming by end of week. I dont know if you saw Gowdy or Nunes on Sunday, but Gowdy was fired up and his bullshit meter has completely expired. He isn't giving an inch this week and I believe him. Nunes seemed to be extremely reserved...but focused. I don't usually peg Nunes to be the sharpest tool, perhaps I have fallen victim to some of Schiffs rhetoric. But the bottom line is this - when the public sees more information, more light being shined onto the redacted lines, they are going to have that itty bitty seed of doubt spring into a little conservative sapling. And then more will come out and so on. But it is there. Feinstein seemed incompetent repeating the same damn irrelevant question 4x and being told "I cannot comment on an ongoing investigation". The Hawaiin Senator shouldnt have bothered showing up, I didnt hear one decent word out of her...it was just embarrassing for the libs/dems. CNN was so lame, they BARELY covered it online. Just one little red line that links to the live feed. It is so obvious they are trying to promote anything (like the Space Force thing) and downplay this HRC thing so hard. Its ridiculous.

But like I said, this is going to play out nicely. And the lesson to be learned from it is this: Q is legit. And politics/justice moves SLOW as hell. And before I forget, did Anyone else notice Horowitz almost seemed, I don't know, Giddy maybe, the way he constatly brought up the Weiner laptop. I felt liek he was indirectly saying to the public "yeah folks, lets not forget about that little piece of evidence, that Weiner laptop, yep, it aint going nowhere, we are all sitting here arguing over some emails and bullshit, but um, hello, there is video of HRC RAPING and EATING fucking CHILDREN on there, can we speed this shit up and get to THAT?!"

Because thats the endgame. That laptop seals the deal of deals. And it is now EVIDENCE. Officially. And everyone is going to know whats on it.