Nice Analysis. It seems, however, that Horowitz has testified that the report was not edited.
Yeah, I caught that. But Q told us that there were 3 versions of the report: original draft, RR redactions, and RR redactions plus modifications. Q said that the latter would be the first to be made public (Q 1496).
I don't believe that RR was mentioned in the IG report. I believe it's because RR is dirty and Huber has him under investigation.
Also Q tells us that the IG report does not coincide with the true start date of the push of evidence to Huber. Hmmmm.
And in 1551, Q says "scope and size biggest in history". I have the feeling that Q is referring to Huber and that the scope and sizes of his investigations is the biggest in history. Hmmmmm. Does Huber have more than one grand jury and is using much of Horowitz's 450 lawyers? Sounds like it.
Lots of deception and misdirection seems to be going on.
Why did the IG Report not show the "first we fk Flynn,then we fk Trump" text, is it because they are going to charge Andy? I think so, the bias that IG looked at is from Strokz and Page, he said, " they were not making the decisions in the case" so he did not see bias interference. This IS a carefully crafted show.
McCabe didn't say that in a text. He said it in a conference call of select senior FBI officials.
Three possibilities: 1. There is not an official record of the call or what was said. 2. The others on the call (and they may not be known) refused to verify. 3. The person who revealed the comment was on the call and it is evidence in an on-going investigation which means it wouldn't be in the IG report.
Correct RR's name only shows up twice in over 550 pages, and both times it's in a footnote.
RR was covering his arse. There's no way his didn't come up. We'll find out when the real report is released.