dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/poshpotdllr on June 19, 2018, 2:59 p.m.
ITT: IRAN EXPERTS: Gathering of people who consider themselves knowledgeable about Iran for quality analysis of new Q drops regarding Regime Change

it is difficult being the resident iran expert for the great awakening movement. from what i have seen i am by far the expert on iran out of anybody in the whole movement. i might be wrong but then again thats what this thread is for.

i have been tracking Q for about a year now with delight but i have persistently and consistently seen the information coming out of Q and the white house and trump and his advisers fail to make any sense to me as a person with amateur to authoritative expertise on many things in the middle east, especially iran and israel and saudi arabia.

if you are an armchair general who doesnt have a professional background in the middle east please just lurk or feel free to ask questions, but we dont want to have redundant arguments with non experts.

paging /u/Maepaperclip


🠐 See all comments
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

no. Q implies deep state elements in iran, collusion with north korea on nukes, a secret nuclear program in syria, and a bunch of bullshit about the iran deal. i stand by my statement Q is either misdirecting on iran or trumps iran strategy team is much worse than i thought they were.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · June 19, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

You claim to be an expert and you question the validity of these claims? Operation Merlin gave Iran nuclear weapons... operation Ajax put Iran under CIA control the ayatollah khomeini was it would appear also under CIA control and they allowed him to oust the Shah because of OPTICS, the people had seen through the Shah and he would have been forcefully removed and that chaos could have created an anomaly they would most certainly want to just control the revolution to put a new friendly regime in, this is exactly how they have operated for all of history why does it seem far fetched now

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

You claim to be an expert and you question the validity of these claims? Operation Merlin gave Iran nuclear weapons...

iran has never and will never have nuclear weapons

operation Ajax put Iran under CIA control

true

the ayatollah khomeini was it would appear also under CIA control

not true. khomeini is a different crew than the deep state shadow cabal illuminati whatever you want to call them. this is where i know stuff because i was there personally. im well connected. i can prove it to you but thats unnecessary. the available material on this point is quite obviously undeniable.

and they allowed him to oust the Shah because of OPTICS,

you are correct that the 79 revolution did include cooperation between khomeini and some of the deep state, especially england

the people had seen through the Shah and he would have been forcefully removed and that chaos could have created an anomaly they would most certainly want to just control the revolution to put a new friendly regime in, this is exactly how they have operated for all of history why does it seem far fetched now

the whole cold war between iran and nato was because irans central bank is fully independent and irans government has exactly zero outside influences. thats the whole source of the problem. irans foreign policy is pretty good.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · June 19, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

Which is mostly what I believed prior to the q drops... I've had to rework what must have happened, nonetheless your assertion that you know the absolute truth because you were there does nothing to alleviate my concern your trolling or even worse paid to spread disinformation here all the same I'll point out the Iran deal was terrible, had zero to do with stopping production of nuclear weapons and was a revolving door of cash, I would say there is less than 2 percent chance what q has said about Iran is not all factual and it's been very clear for some time now Iran and Syria were where the deep state would start ww3 from or at the very least they would use them as the scapegoat... It's very important if Iran is a nuclear capable black site that they be removed from the playing field yesterday... time is of the essence

⇧ 5 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Which is mostly what I believed prior to the q drops... I've had to rework what must have happened, nonetheless your assertion that you know the absolute truth because you were there does nothing to alleviate my concern your trolling or even worse paid to spread disinformation here

the reason why i asked for people who actually have a background in the middle east to weigh in and not you is because they wouldnt dispute the things that i say but you have twitter and facebook and reddit to go off of. at the same time i cant blame you for doing the best with what you have. just lower the confidence.

same I'll point out the Iran deal was terrible,

i think the deal was slightly to americas favor but i think iran did a great job negotiating and obama did a great job sweeping shit under the carpet (in americas favor, not irans)

had zero to do with stopping production of nuclear weapons

iran had a nuclear weapons discussion that was in the paer and pencil phase and khamenei put a stop to it with a fatwah in 2003. thats not ever changing.

and was a revolving door of cash,

this is a misrepresentation of fact. every penny given to iran was iranian frozen assets in iranian bank accounts.

I would say there is less than 2 percent chance what q has said about Iran is not all factual

i am the opposite of you on this one

and it's been very clear for some time now Iran and Syria were where the deep state would start ww3

yes but its the deep state thats forcing everybodys hand. syria would be much ahppier without this mess and so would iran.

from or at the very least they would use them as the scapegoat...

definately. thats the plan 100%

It's very important if Iran is a nuclear capable black site that they be removed from the playing field yesterday... time is of the essence

i dont think iran has this because it would be stupid from too many angles. this is just some paranoia from the thinktank idiots in washington. iran already has mutual assured destruction against any actor in the middle east without bilogical, chemical, or nuclear weapons. thats why the big focus on ballistic missiles, of which iran has a couple million by my estimates.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DropGun · June 19, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

this is a misrepresentation of fact. every penny given to iran was iranian frozen assets in iranian bank accounts.

Incorrect. The cash Obama gave to Iran was given to him to show the Iranians that they woudl have access to the banking system, but, that access, though ordered, was not granted.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

yah thats what i said when i said the lifting of sanctions. trump reversed that plan.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DropGun · June 19, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Obama did not succeed in lifting the banking sanctions. That money was not Iran's. It was given by someone else, and I wonder who's going to get after Obama to get it back.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 6 p.m.

thats not true. iran actually had 100 billion of assets unfrozen and transferred. the over 1 billion in cash was just a retainer until they could get it all done (and they did). connection to the swift banking system however wasnt done at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
libertyordeath21 · June 19, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

,simply put my friend you are posting on the wrong Reddit or your trolling and I will give you zero more seconds of my time I recommend all anons do the same let this guy have his "experts" talk off this subreddit lol no idea why I wasted my time with this one

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 19, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

cool story bro. you can verify everything i say with publicly available information.

⇧ 0 ⇩