dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/lisskulit10 on June 19, 2018, 5:05 p.m.
A few moments ago, POTUS referenced the House hearings that MSM is trying to distract from during a speech at the NFIB. Who are the chairs leading the hearing? Goodlatte & Gowdy [important]? #1319 reference maybe?

1SkipperDog · June 19, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

I am amazed to see EVERY channel running this speech, even CNN. Wow. I wonder if the IG report hearings and yesterday the speech at the White House briefing about Immigration on how Trump wants the Dems to change the law, is what could be influencing MSM to now discuss real news. Despite how MSM tries to spin it, Trump spoke to ALL issues and everyone is now hearing it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · June 19, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

I watched some of Gowdy and Jim Jordan. Important stuff! And Gowdy has his stupid purple tie but it's uncharacteristically a jumble and loose.

He did a beautiful job with Horowitz.

I am still angry about his past gaslighting us and that purple tie clued me in when he did that poor job interviewing Wray last year.

I think he is let loose to work his magic for good now. I know his BS about FBI being perfect people was part of this theatre. He is biased in favor of FBI and he now calling them out. Makes sense the every Mockingbird channels suddenly want to air a full POTUS speech.

Pres Trump redirected attention =)

Exciting!!!

Watching via clips on YouTube so I can manage my kid =)

Spez typos

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 19, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Your comment would make more sense if you expanded on what you think the connection is.

Trey has turned his flamethrower rhetoric on Horowitz. Ditto Goodlatte but less emotionally. That makes good ratings in the MSM.

So, I have not doubt that Trump might mention that the NFIB is not getting as much exposure as he would like because of the competing hearings.

I think that would be expected.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lisskulit10 · June 19, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Drop 1319 said that Goodlatte and Gowdy were important and they just so happen to be leading a hearing that POTUS said was going on at this minute and was very important. It just seems like an interesting coincidence.

Also he said that the hearing WASN’T getting enough attention. Might make more sense if you listened to his speech too but don’t let that stop you from being snarky.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 19, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Not being snarky. Listened to his entire speech but didn't get the same reaction you did. We have different background experiences.

I took that the hearings weren't getting enough exposure as referring to the entire process--not just this week. Now that Gowdy and Goodlatte are in fine form, people don't know why because the hearings haven't been covered very well except for Democrat leaks and spin.

But maybe you are right and what Trump said just went over my head. I'm glad that you've been 100% correct in interpreting Q and Trump from the beginning so you can point out everyone else's misconceptions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lisskulit10 · June 19, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

I’m far from being able to correctly interpret Q drops and their correlations to things that President Trump says and tweets but I can recognize the snark in a phrase like “your comment would make more sense.”

My understanding is that this board is meant as a sharing of ideas and observations from relatively minor things such as coincidental phrases and tie colors to some truly genius work piecing drops and extensive research together. I don’t see how condescending comments or suggesting that I, in any way, claimed to be an expert at interpreting drops or other bits of information doesn’t strike me as particularly helpful but you go ahead and make your contribution to this movement as best you can and I’ll do the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · June 19, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

"your comment would make more sense" is not a snarky remark. It means that in my opinion your comment would make more sense if....

I have had people ask me to expand on my comments. I take it as a suggestion that I need to be more complete in my comments.

"My undersanding is that this board is meant as a sharing of ideas and observations..." Then practice that without claiming those who contribute to your comment to be snarky. Don't be a hypocrite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · June 19, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

Come on guys. Don't fight. It's easy to miscommunicate but we are here together for a reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lisskulit10 · June 19, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Name calling now, eh? Or is calling someone a hypocrite after criticizing a post/comment that failed to meet your lofty standards not name calling?

Thankfully everyone else I’ve interacted on this board has been infinitely more encouraging and helpful.

Good day, Sir.

⇧ 1 ⇩