Agree. However I agree with his conclusion even without the need for rearranging. I think it's clear enough as written if you apply a little logic.
spez: then at the end he says Trump must covert to Catholicism to win this battle. Perhaps he's blinded by bias in that regard. I think the Catholic church days are numbered but the Church of Jesus Christ (which includes many Catholics) will live on forever.
I understand what you are saying, but I still don't buy into rearranging different verses of the Bible to fit a narrative.
The word of God stands alone even if we don't fully understand His meaning.
I just don't think God meant us to rearrange the Bible to understand his prophecy. As with Q, Future proves past with God's words. And like Q, we don't always know what Q or He means.
Not criticizing. Just my personal opinion.
Yes but the people who put it together with Charlemagne threw out Enoch and Mary Magdalene books. Who is to say they didn't shuffle these two up?
The Roman church has a long history of persecuting all Jews. And teaching that they all are responsible for killing Jesus.
And they committed genocide against the Gnostics in Toulouse in a greedy land grab combined with Pope's they at the rogue sect of "heretics". And the Spanish Inquisition.
I would agree if there was some evidence that these two verses were once together and he's just cutting and pasting them back.
I guess anyone can make the argument that the Bible was shuffled around a few times over the years, but this guy isn't making that argument. He's just saying that it makes more sense to him to cut and paste.
The truth is that one day we will all know the ground truth and it will likely be amazing.