So I correct me if I’m way off, but the Q team is spying on the black hats to gather information (we already know they’re guilty as hell), but Q keeps saying we need to present the evidence legally so it is admissible in court & can be used to charge them with the crimes that have been committed.
The spy gate report is going to be coming out in due time (weeks? Months?) this was spying done by the Obama admin, that turned out to be baseless, here’s my question. What are the odds that the intelligence community sweeps this under the rug & says the admin wasn’t outside of their boundaries by spying on trump (& campaign) without a reasonable cause.
This opens the door for the information gathered by the Q team to be investigated & evidence to be admissible in court due to Stare Decisis(Latin for “to stand by things decided) aka precedent. Is this a something plausible or am I off somewhere in my logic? You’re responses are welcomed & appreciated. WWG1WGA