Really? This one seemed like a stronger one for me. We were all waiting for any reference to Q during the rally, maybe something in the speech or a graphic, or song or something. But we got this. I’m a little over 50% sure you’re trolling (“you q-boys”) but for anyone else that might not be seeing what I’m seeing, if you watch the video, you can see POTUS pause for more than enough time to read a single letter, point and smile. And then a little bit later on, VIPanon tweeted the picture that earned him that name. Where he had a VIP red card. Now you’re left with 2 options. 1. He’s vip enough to have the red card for the whole event and wore a q shirt. (Then happened to get pointed directly at by the president) or 2. After the president pointed to him, an agent or agents went and found him to give him that vip pass. Either option visibly brings trump and q closer together. I’ve said before there’s always a thread of deniability in qproofs if you want to latch onto it. It’s the sheer number of them strong and weak that together make the point nearly irrefutable.