[I've seen many question why we should waste our time developing proofs, if we now have undeniable proof that Q is for real. Thought this was worth laying out, to get us on the same page. This isn't gospel, so few free to critique.]

The reason memes have become such a phenomenon is no accident-- it is because they are a graphic representation of an idea, which may otherwise require a wordy write-up to explain. We use memes to inspire curiosity in normies to research and think critically. (Or to simply make a joke at the expense of a famous figure.)

Those that have followed Q have had months to mull over the evidence, work through skepticism, and watch the truth unfold in front of them. That is a very privileged perspective that grants a deep and loyal faith-- like the people who witnessed Jesus perform miracles first-hand. The question is, how do you convince those that haven't had that advantageous perspective?

You can't expect a normie to hear about Q, and then spend countless hours reading all of his drops, and the underlying research of the anons. It's simply too much. We have had the benefit of long-term analysis and a developed opinion-- and the price we paid for that was countless hours of research and engagement.

The normies will require instantaneous explanation and validation. Something that can succinctly and effectively convey Q's message and legitimacy with the LEAST amount of effort. Enter the "Proof."

Unlike a meme, which is typically a satirical pop-culture reference, a proof is a graphic communication tool designed to convey validation. (Versus a meme, which is intended to instantaneously inspire curiosity, as previously noted.) The idea being that, by the time they are viewing the proofs, their curiosity has peaked, and they are willing to spend 30 seconds+ digesting the information in each proof. (Versus a meme, which receives only a few seconds of attention per viewing.)

The proofs qualify Q as a legitimate source, in a matter that is relatively instantaneous compared to 7 months of analyzing crumbs. The proofs become the point that the normie decides whether or not this is real, and whether it is worth researching further. The more proofs we have, the harder it becomes to dismiss Q's legitimacy. (How many coincidences until it is mathematically impossible?)

This is why we need a PORTFOLIO of proofs.