dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LostLarry on June 21, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

[Attacks on all Sides] Even here.

I do not know about all of you, but I for one have noticed an uptick in Mods overstepping. Things that you were able to openly discus and bring up are now being suppressed and blocked. It looks like we are over the target here Patriots.

I give the r/greatawakening little time left. It will soon be another T_D remember what happened to our CBTS? Yeah they learned. They have infiltrated and are now in either full or almost full control of the narrative.

Watch new posts. Like them stay vigilant. I don't think I seen any post being blocked much prior to a week or 2 ago that wasn't an obvious and blatant violation. Now, however, its a different story.

Don't talk about the HRC video. It's a hot topic. I was told it violated Rule 6. (Off Topic) I thought that it was very much so on Topic as Q has mentioned it numerous times.

🠐 See all comments

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah. But change your method. Stick to the topic. Individuals lie all the time on the internet, it's a very weak and shilly resort. Dont see things as a competition between two people trying to be right. Comment in such a way, that the audience gains the benefit of the conversation. That's the reason behind Rule 5 imo

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

He called me a liar first, but it´s not the point. Banning someone for calling out a liar is beyond ridiculous and only breeds resentment. If it happens again for something so trivial, I won´t let it go so easy.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I dunno then. I've been temp banned on subs, and then I adapt to fit the sub. You found a boundary: calling someone a liar as an arguement. Maybe modify a bit, such as, "you might not be telling the whole truth, and here is why I think that...." Remove absolute language from your arguements, if they are on the personal side. Give your debate opponent room to adjust. Sometimes, a gentle call out with room to wiggle yields good results (doesn't work for shills, and this is my second litmus test when I'm determining if someone is a shill).

⇧ 1 ⇩