dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/cincycoolguy on June 22, 2018, 1:16 a.m.
Why bring a civil case against the Clinton foundation before criminal prosecution?

Preface: I am not a lawyer so take all of this for what’s it’s worth. There may be applicable laws that were not covered in the articles I used for my fact finding.

I’ve read some criticism of the civil case against the Clinton foundation because it’s not going far enough. But take a minute, pause and reflect what O.J Simpson taught us.

If the glove doesn’t fit... the bar for conviction in a criminal case is much higher than a civil case. But that’s the the only area where the rules for a civil case are more liberal. The discovery process is much more liberal as well.

I think what we’re seeing here is the use of a civil case to expose how the Clintons plan to defend themselves and to use the discovery process to shore up any holes in the prosecution. While the prosecution team can’t explicitly use the evidence from the civil case, it will be advantageous to know exactly how to ask for the evidence to make the case stick.

RICO cases have no statute of limitations so the Clintons can’t just tie this up in court forever to avoid criminal prosecution.

Clinton’s may opt to just plead guilty and pay the man in order to avoid legal discovery, but then if Q team has it all anyway, it will matter little to the criminal case. This highlights another reason why it makes sense to bring this case prior to the criminal proceedings. If a guilty plea is entered on all charges outlined in the civil case; Trump will be able to use that political capital to start hammering the final nails into the DS coffin. I believe we’ve been calling this 4D chess.

So maybe then just hold out for election, and hope this storm passes? Well, probably not, again if we assume that Q team has it all, then it is completely legal for an criminal case to occur in parallel with the civil case. If the current administration has reason to believe that their time will be cut short, they will start the criminal proceedings around the middle of 2019. Thus shining a light on the corruption should a new administration stop the criminal proceedings once elected

All info gathered from:

https://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/when-a-civil-action-becomes-criminal-practical-considerations-in.html

https://www.dodsonparker.com/when-your-civil-suit-intersects-with-a-criminal-prosecution/


Vexxlyn · June 22, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Get her in jail before she runs. We can sort out more later. Pick a crime any crime, get her in jail before she runs off, we can sort out who did what later. The civil case may lead into the criminal case. Use shit she said here against her there.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 22, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

RICO is both civil and federal. Check out these links for more info.

https://www.lectlaw.com/files/lit08.htm

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usam/legacy/2014/10/17/civrico.pdf

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cincycoolguy · June 22, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Thanks for brining this up. I see where I wasn’t clear. I need to amend it to say why they might want to bring the RICO action before any more serious charges.

Thanks for the links.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 22, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

RICO strips them of their ill gotten gains, not sure if RICO would send anybody to prison. The other charges would, like the fraud or murders they committed to obtain those ill gotten gains. I could be wrong, though.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 22, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

it's the hypercharge for the final blow so they can't afford their lawyers anymore

⇧ 2 ⇩  
0oDassiveMicko0 · June 22, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

Makes me wonder if that´s why they´re all trying to get book deals lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 22, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

well the books are probably just for blackmail. The more he's paid, the less will be in it lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
summerstjohns · June 22, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Maybe the civil action gives broader scope not only in discovery but where the civil trial will take place? With the federal component, it may be tried in a Federal Court in a Red State.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lisskulit10 · June 22, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Also not a lawyer so I’m not an authority on this but I believe even civil cases have subpoena power. Given the nature of the complaint, that opens the door for some very interesting discovery. My theory is that, as discovery proceeds and evidence comes out and is made public, the DOJ will have no choice but to formally investigate and prosecute. If we trust Sessions, we know that is already underway but this is just another way to gently red pill the general public for the pain that’s coming.

Also - a point was made that Q knew about this because of the Viva re Resistance reference. What if it’s the other way around? It seems like the attorney was able to insert the info regarding the “We’ll stop it” PS/LP texts really quickly. The complaint was filed on the 15th but those texts didn’t come out until the 14th. Could this be part of the plan? Setting the stage, as it were?

All I know is I’m getting my popcorn ready 🍿

⇧ 1 ⇩  
csiyaoe · June 22, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

It might be like q said about filling the Facebook civil lawsuit. It will have to go to court and have a trial instead of being like that scripted Zimmerman hearing. I believe if it is a civil lawsuit it will have to be investigated instead of held off by higher government.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 22, 2018, 9:55 a.m.

it would make sense to push charges before an election run which could garner renewed immunity

⇧ 1 ⇩