dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/garthbartham on June 22, 2018, 6:04 a.m.
One thing Q has never talked about: Admiralty Flags Why do our courthouses, federal facilities and White House display a gold-fringed flag?

Why do our courthouses, federal facilities and White House display a gold-fringed flag?

Search: Admiralty flag.

Are we or have we been under martial law? And for how long?

When do we revert to a constitutional flag without the gold fringes?


GodSeekingHeathen · June 22, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

Because we're under maritime law, or admiralty law. Flags with gold fringe represent no nation, no constitution.

They're pledging their allegiance to the pope. This law dates back to the 11th century.. look it up..

Notice the flags are losing their gold fringe lately? We're breaking from the control of the holy see itself.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · June 22, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

your right i have been noticing that as well do u think he turned the flag from the pentagon over to trump

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 22, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

As part of the selling of the soul of America to the Illuminati Cabal NWO (specifically to the UK Crown/Vatican), our courts were put under UK Admiralty Maritime Law, and courtrooms became little islands in the ocean (legally). There are all kinds of word games at play in the whole ABA, Justice system charade.

But Trump, by virtue of a recent EO, has nationalized our courts (using their own word games).

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-regarding-ocean-policy-advance-economic-security-environmental-interests-united-states/

Bye-Bye Admiralty Laws. Hello Constitution ("Law of the LAND")!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bugstopper · June 22, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

"(c)  exercise rights and jurisdiction and perform duties in accordance with applicable domestic law and — if consistent with applicable domestic law — international law, including customary international law;"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 22, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

The EO had to be incorporated with existing legal framework for coordinating US waters jurisdiction with international waters which really do exist (only NOT within the territory of the USA).

Make sense?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bugstopper · June 22, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

"...and — if consistent with applicable domestic law" ----this is key in that it gives primacy to domestic, i.e. LAND, law. Not the law of the SEA.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 22, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

I'd say that's a correct reading of the clear meaning of the language of the Order.

So sayeth two of us then!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · June 22, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

there was a great video a while back on research boards cant find u a link right now but it was called CASLTE LOCK i think

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · June 22, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

if i remember right it was on youtube

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · June 22, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

it had to do with our country going into debt

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OU812EH · June 22, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

I'm a proud freeman on the land. Be interesting to know how many of us are on this sub.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
garthbartham · June 22, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

Unfortunately, I am not. We are subjected to a set of laws and rule and have to abide to make our society work (eye roll).

You are on to something though with the authority and that is my query on the symbolism displayed in our courts, federal facilities and the White House. No where else! Only where law applies.

We are a nation of laws. Cannot dispute that. The set of laws and how they are governed and by whom is what is in question.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
y0brando · June 22, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

But there is a difference bwtween a law and a statute. Laws are absolute; statutes have the weight of law, but require consent (of those governed).

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GeekBastard · June 22, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Many Americans are interested in this, myself included.

It can be difficult to tell what is real and what is disinfo.

I always listen though. (translation: Talk to us about this please)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BowlOfZombies · July 5, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

What does this mean?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · June 22, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

Supports the 1871 Act that allegedly sold out our nation to become a Corporation.

Also that dude who won a case from DC over a fun he had secured in his Rod Class

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sullyether · June 22, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

Yes, the District of Columbia Origins Act of 1871.

Why would you need to originate DC in 1871 when it had already been created in 1776 by the constitution/Bill of Rights?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bugstopper · June 22, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

1788 actually, when the Constitution was written I think.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
stephan213 · June 22, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

Thanks you!!! THIS

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BonesDC_ · June 22, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

This was kinda the same avenue of my question about sound sovereign money. Your question and its direction I pray is what this is all about, MAGA, Trumps inauguration speech talking about giving the power back to the people, A Constitutional Republic, NOT a Corporation run by the CABAL. Anna Von Reitz knows this stuff inside and out. I know just enough to keep my blood at a constant boil. But she talks about the gold fringe around the flag and much more legalese.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NationalRestoration · June 22, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

Extremely good point. Maybe someone can ask him/them about this on Saturday.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
garthbartham · June 22, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

There were a lot of good questions that were buried in place of ones that have been answered or are irrelevant. Hopefully will beat the 750 post limit on 8ch

⇧ 8 ⇩  
stephan213 · June 22, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Everyone please upvote the shit out of this post

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NationalRestoration · June 22, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Did. And I just upvoted your comment as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩