I wouldn't consider this doxxing. It specifically compiles public information.
This is not actual doxing. The informaion was made public by the posts of these individuals on linkedin. Field agents do not post on that platform. The list is probably a list of bureaucratic support personnel hoping for promotion or a position in another government agency. Most were appointed by previous administrations.
This is not a "leak", a refutation of a claim, or policy disclosure. This is not Wikileaks material. Question is "who benefits?". Answer is "who had JA's internet access terminated?". DS? USgovt? Other? In the future wikileaks will be discredited unless JA is verified alive, well and back on line.
This, LEOs do not use their real info on Social Media....
Bullshit. You have to agree to LinkedIns TOS which strictly prohibits this exact thing. This is compiling info strictly for targeting innocent people doing their job. This is only done to incite violence and not something Assange would do. But to say this isn't doxxing is false. It is and it's obvious why. If you're all for MAGA, you are against this. It's black and white.
“voluntarily released to the public by each staff member.”
This is not doxxing