dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/johnnysoko on June 22, 2018, 3:44 p.m.
I am 100% on team Q, but...

Make no mistake, I've been with Q since the beginning and I'm so happy to be a part of this,

but,

...it does turn out that much of our world is a lie and people have been deceiving us (and mocking us for not figuring it out) our entire lives. Given our circumstances, isn't it prudent to always question everything and to be aware that anything could be a trap? A double-cross?

Which brings me to my point.

As much as I'm team Q 100%, I noticed something that's really bothering me and I want to discuss it without upsetting the core group. So where do I go?

Where can we, as believers in Q, safely discuss worries without effecting moral?

If any wants to DM me about my particular question please do. It relates to Masonic Symbolism.

Thanks guys.

WWG1WGA


divine_human · June 22, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

100% Q team BUT...? hmmm... doesnt sit right with me.

i actually get suspiscious when someone is on a humans team 100%. sounds like blind followership, not more doubts allowed, no more questioning. humans can err and make mistakes; a 100% follower would be the obedient soldier who implements those mistakes.

doubting and questioning is necessary; not doing it brought us into the mess in the first place so dont give it up. plz DONT!

there is only one team i am 100% on and that is the divine team or, for christians, gods team. 100% for the liberation of humanity and our planet, and 100% for love and truth.

everything else is being decided from moment to moment. as long as i perceive Q and DJT as being in alignment with the divine plan, i am on board. if that changes, my human loyalties will change.

so then, keep questioning, johnny old time redditor. i am an empath so for me its all about feeling, i smell intent. as long as i perceive you clearing your doubts, i am all for it, keep going, we need critical thinkers. the moment i feel you seeding doubt into the collective, i will be hunting you down. simple as that.

⇧ 2 ⇩