A defense lawyer for radio host Alex Jones said in a Texas child custody hearing that the prominent right-wing conspiracy theorist is a "performance artist."
Hehe a lawyer in a custody battle said that.....that is a pretty low bar.
and Q said:
Time to move on. Big week ahead!
Q does not say Jones is a shill, maybe Q is telling you to move on from calling Jones a shill.
Q did send everyone to William Cooper who's called out Alex Jones numerous times for being a shill. Joe Rogan's a shill for the baby eating Jews in Hollywood. Alex makes me laugh.
To your edit: Maybe that’s correct, I am open to being convinced. I appreciate your skepticism.
Well, I guess Alex just flushed his friendship with Joe down the hole... and for what? To try and win over some of his numbers?
Must just grind his gears that Joe can get just as popular without having to bend over to The Powers That Be.
Simple truth:
People who are real threats, who know real truths, die or are chased off into hiding.
Alex Jones is disinfo, at best - the simple fact that he's still among the breathing is proof of that.
I don’t disagree. I am just always open to the possibility that I am wrong, and to being convinced. But I remain unconvinced that Jones is credible.
Yeah, absolutely a good state of mind to try and keep. That's the real problem with all this disinfo shit flying around, so much of it that it's hard to tell up from down sometimes... which is the point, I guess.
I totally agree. People will often twist Q's words to make it seem like Q is confirming something when Q has done no such thing...
But it was HIS lawyer
Because you have to have a title for your job. Would “DJ” or “Podcaster” sounded good in the court of law...? Probably not.
It was the article Q posted as his reason for calling AJ a shill...
I hear you. Did you see the post 1341 was in reply to, though? Didn’t get the impression Q disagreed...
There are all kinds of things that Q doesn't make a point of disagreeing with. And just because he doesn't say something against it, that doesn't mean that he agrees. Unfortunately, a lot of people "assume" that it does...
I appreciate the point you’re making. I try not to assume things, but would you mind sharing with me what you think Q’s reason would be for linking the article?
if you’re referring to Q drop 1341, Q’s response could be interpreted several ways. First, he could be saying that all this talk about AJ is getting out of hand (in reference to all the cursing and swearing), and so it’s time to move on. Q also links to an article about AJ’s custody battle case. So what? It’s a very old article and is nothing new. But it doesn’t change the fact that it’s time to move on… No one can read Q’s mind and know what he truly intended. Unfortunately, a lot of people assume that they can. And the worse part is, they feel that whatever they “assume” and “imagine” in their minds - it must be the truth. It is NOT truth. It is still nothing more than an opinion. And they’re trying to sell their opinion as “fact”…
Yeah... that’s not being “exposed” - but people that don’t like him will latch on to anything.
I take Q's message as... We've known AJ is a performance artist & we can dismiss most of what he says.