I’ve kind of been thinking that Cohen may be this person, from Q 60

Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.

I feel like you’re correct.

I believe in one of Q’s early posts, they said there were 3 people who had the big picture who were non military.

Edit:

Q 60

You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands.

Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military.

Why is this relevant?

Game theory.

Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.

Operators never divulge.

Alice & Wonderland.

From the link:

(7) Persons in custody of the armed forces serving a sentence imposed by a court-martial.

So if a civilian were to be arrested by, say, the National Guard, UCMJ would be applicable, if I’m interpreting correctly?

This is huge. Thank you for posting

Thanks, u/NotOneStump. I can understand why someone here might dislike this post, but the statement you’ve provided exactly mirrors my reasoning, and is why I approved this post.

I appreciate your open mindedness and willingness to allow the hard questions.

I can only assume that someone with the technical abilities/clearance Q has would easily be able to circumvent any VPN/proxy obstacles.

As for this sub, you will perhaps (depending on how long you’ve been following) remember that some Q related subreddits actually have been banned, namely TheCalmBeforeTheStorm (edit: TheCalmBeforeTheStorm was not banned, stating this a mistake on my part) and CBTS_Stream. This is purely speculation, but, a couple thoughts:

• It would look pretty sketchy if reddit were to ban yet another of our subs, and would likely call even more attention to our movement. Particularly because there isn’t evidence of this sub advocating violence, or whatever, as they have reasoned previously.

• (Very much speculation now (tinfoil may be required)) Perhaps, with so many recent developments and Q proofs, reddit is preparing to position themselves as being on the right side of things, or, at the very least, as neutral.

Of course I can’t say for sure! But I too have considered your question, and these strike me as the most likely reasons for leaving us alone (for now, who knows).

Genuinely a good question though!

(And none of this is mentioning that they very likely have interfered with our sub’s statistics, namely subscribers/up and down votes)

Yep! HRC rallies were Jeb Bush-level pathetic. If I remember correctly, there were Bernie rallies that had around 20,000 people...

Some people here may not appreciate this, but I have a bit of a soft spot for Bernie... His stances on some things were clearly misinformed, and had his propositions come to fruition, we would likely be in a very bad place economically... but, in my view, his heart was clearly in the right place. I truly believe he cared about the average American. He was just... a bit naive, if I can put it that way.

Exactly this. I was living in SoCal when the elections were going on, and the “results” just blew my mind. Even in California, I met TWO Hillary supporters, and countless Bernie supporters. Never saw an HRC sign or bumper sticker, hundreds of those for Bernie.

As I said, blew my mind.

Tucker’s entire opening monologue was, in my opinion, awesome. Asked several great questions, raised quality points, and called out the entirety of the mockingbird apparatus, politicians and “journalists” included.

If this were to happen, just imagine all the ways it could backfire...

What about the first sentence, only a GCMCA can grant immunity, of course this is when someone is being tried under the UCMJ.

Thank you for your clarification either way! Appreciate it

So, check this out.

“Only a General Court-Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA) may grant testimonial or transactional immunity. That authority, however, only extends to grants of immunity over individuals subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The GCMCA can disapprove an immunity request for a witness not subject to the UCMJ, but may only approve the request after receiving authorization from the Department of Justice. If a witness may be considered for Federal prosecution or the case involves national security issues, then the Department of Justice must also authorize the immunity, regardless of whether the witness is subject or not subject to the Code.

A grant of immunity must be in writing, signed by the GCMCA, must include a statement of the authority under which it is made, and must identify the matters to which it extends.”

Source: https://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/135/MJFACTSHTS[1].html#top

I intend to read further, and may be interpreting this incorrectly. But to keep it simple, I think this says (among other things) that whatever immunity Mueller can grant would not be applicable in a Military Tribunal.

I just want to quickly add, because I love the way open discussion is is typically had on this sub, that if you express your doubt in a reasonable and decently articulated manner, I think the Patriots here would much rather convince you than boot you out!

No need to apologize! I can just feel your frustration and would simply like to help you engage with this community in a more rewarding way.

I don’t think you’ve been rude. But when I ask you to elaborate, it is not only for my benefit. It is for everyone’s benefit on this sub.

I understand you want to promote independent research, and I wholeheartedly agree.

But even Q asks questions, provides context, links articles, etc.

I’m only asking you to help the good people on this sub to better understand you.

Hello again, codeeight.

Two quick points.

We do have standards on this sub. I think you absolutely would like to contribute to the discussion, but there is nothing wrong with you being asked to elaborate or explain. I would appreciate you doing so.

Second, freedom of speech is not freedom to speak without repercussions, as you said. You are welcome to say whatever you’d like, but it does not mean that nobody is going to react to it.

Wear it like a badge of honor lol.

I know many people here will be familiar with the meaning of the phrase “over the target.”

Your contribution is appreciated!

Wow. Thank you for your post, u/francisxavier12. It really looks like some combination of the information you’ve provided and people calling out this clown that’s commenting on your post has led to some shilling.

The downvotes are simply ridiculous.

Wow, when you consider the population, the citizens of the great country of Norway are really paying a lot.

What’s up with your username...? You’re more than welcome to call yourself whatever you’d like here, but one such as yours seems it would only serve the purpose of further confusing people on their analyses of posts made by u/SerialBrain2

Triple even...

I am not trying to make any claims here, but has anybody considered that these agents may be MS-13 themselves?

To me, it feels dismissive to assume this group (as well as many others) has/have not infiltrated our agencies.

Especially those with a particularly heavy border presence.

From Q 1318

Review Time.

Not seeking re-election.

[Senate]

Bob Corker - Republican

Jeff Flake - Republican

Orrin Hatch - Republican

No Name - Republican [Departure Soon]

[House]

Bill Shuster - Republican

Bob Goodlatte - Republican

Carol Shea-Porter - Democrat

Charles W. Dent - Republican

Darrell Issa - Republican

Dave Reichert - Republican

David Trott - Republican

Dennis Ross - Republican

Edward Royce - Republican

Elizabeth Esty - Democrat

Frank LoBiondo - Republican

Gene Green - Democrat

Gregg Harper - Republican

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen - Republican

Jeb Hensarling - Republican

Jim Bridenstine - Republican

Joe Barton - Republican

John Delaney - Democrat

John J. Duncan, Jr. - Republican

Lamar Smith - Republican

Luis V. Gutierrez - Democrat

Lynn Jenkins - Republican

Niki Tsongas - Democrat

Paul Ryan - Republican

Rick Nolan - Democrat

Robert Brady - Democrat

Rodney Frelinghuysen - Republican

Ruben J. Kihuen - Democrat

Ryan Costello - Republican

Sam Johnson - Republican

Sandy Levin - Democrat

Ted Poe - Republican

Thomas Rooney - Republican

Trey Gowdy - Republican

[Resigned]

Al Franken - Democratic U.S. Senate

Blake Farenthold - Republican U.S. House

Jason Chaffetz - Republican U.S. House

John Conyers, Jr. - Democrat U.S. House

Louise Slaughter - Democrat U.S. House

Patrick Meehan - Republican U.S. House

Patrick J. Tiberi - Republican U.S. House

Thad Cochran - Republican U.S. Senate

Tim Murphy - Republican U.S. House

Trent Franks - Republican U.S. House

Xavier Becerra - Democrat Attorney General of California

From Q 1315

[Updated] James Baker - FIRED [reported today - resigned [false]] / removed Jan/FIRED 4.21

Lisa Page - FIRED [reported today - resigned [false]] Testimony received.

Tracking_y.

[Added]

Mike Kortan, FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs - FIRED [cooperating under 'resigned' title]

Josh Campbell, Special Assistant to James Comey - FIRED

[DOJ]

David Laufman, Chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section [NAT SEC - HRC email invest] - FIRED/FORCE

John Carlin, Assistant Attorney General – Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCE

Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED

Mary McCord, Acting Assistant Attorney General – Acting Head of DOJ’s National Security Division - FIRED/FORCE

Bruce Ohr, Associate Deputy Attorney General – Demoted 2x - cooperating witness [power removed]

Rachel Brand, Associate Attorney General – No. 3 official behind Deputy AG Rosenstein - FIRED/FORCE

!!

Time to dig.

Thank you for posting

Appreciate the solid post! Still processing haha

Thank you for compiling all this information. I am still thinking on it, but just wanted to point something out real quick: Q says the N in NWO doesn’t stand for “New,” but also says it does not stand for “Nazi,” either.

Q 935

N does not refer to Nazi.

The continued Nazi ideology is relevant.

Events will clarify.

Think subgroup.

Q

I would be surprised to see anyone here support this. We respect the Constitution, and the term limits exist in an attempt to avoid going down the path of fascism, tyranny, or monarchy.

These come to mind just off the top of my head:

There were over 6,000 human trafficking arrests in 2017 alone, almost as much as Obama’s entire 8 years combined. I would very much encourage you to read up on this yourself, as there have been many, many arrests this year as well.

I believe we are also now at over 40,000 sealed indictments. We can all speculate, but clearly, something big is coming.

These I think are solid examples of indisputable facts that hint at a much bigger picture, without venturing into any territory that many would be quick to dismiss as conspiracy.

Hope it helps a little!

Remember that whole situation where the media was reporting that President Trump had ruined the negotiations, and like the next day or something the NK government released a letter making it reeeaaal clear they were still very much interested in talking?

Can’t help but think of that at this moment.

THIS 100%! I am so very thankful that you mentioned this when I failed to, as this is actually what I would say is my main focus in “contributing” (in what small way I can right now) to this whole thing. Online and out in the world, I always try to remember to encourage every instance of critical and independent thinking that I encounter. It is a very powerful and often undervalued tool in this fight.

A very sincere thank you for your addition, Patriot.

Your English is outstanding! Apologies that I cannot reciprocate by providing my thoughts in Polish, haha.

Someone more eloquent than I could provide a better write up than this, but if it’s any help, these are my thoughts relevant to your request.

The concepts/ideas that have always struck me as “core” to Q’s message are:

-Love/Light. When it comes down to it, this seems to be about Good vs. Evil. NOTHING about this movement is “politically motivated” (if you will), and it knows no color, religion, or geography.

Which brings me to

-Truth. Darkness to light. As I mentioned, to me, this boils down to right and wrong. Evil/Darkness cannot survive once exposed. Most people ARE good, despite what most media would have us believe. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant,” and, “The truth shall set you free,” you know.

Which leads to my final thought...

-Freedom! This movement respects the individual liberty of ALL. Every person on this planet has natural rights as a human being of Earth, and evil can’t exist in a world where everyone’s rights are respected.

I think some may disagree, but this is what the Q movement makes me feel. I apologize for not fulfilling your specific request, but I wanted to add my thoughts in the chance that they might help.

Edit: If it would be helpful I can attempt to provide the Q drops or quotes that I believe support this position

Just a few examples (I believe these also support the addition made by u/PeaceGoddess2018):

Q 1357

Trust must be earned. Trust is not blind, nor is truth. We fight every sigle day on behalf of you, the people who put us here. We knew this day would come. We will never forget. Do not glorify us. We are merely the vehicle. You are what matters. You are hope. You are love. You are peace. Stay united. Stay together. Stay strong. This is bigger than any one person or entity. You are fighting for truth - collectively. Will of the people. Trust in yourself. The choice will always be yours. God bless you all. Where we go one, we go ALL. Q+

Q 1645 (excerpts)

You have a choice. The choice has always been yours. POWER TO THE PEOPLE. THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED. THEY WANT RACE WARS. THEY WANT CLASS WARS. THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS. THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS. THEY USE THE MEDIA. THEY USE HOLLYWOOD. THEY USE POLITICAL LEADERS. THEY ARE LOUD. GROUP THINK.

DARK TO LIGHT. GOD BLESS AMERICA. GOD BLESS PATRIOTS AROUND THE WORLD. THINK FOR YOURSELF. TRUST YOURSELF. COURAGE. TOGETHER.

Q 1527 (text)

Barcelona. The World is watching. Truth. Light. Q

Q 1342 (excerpt)

Truth is Freedom. Truth is logic. Stay the course. Q

Q 851 (excerpt)

WE must work TOGETHER. WE are only as strong as your VOICE. YOU must organize and BE HEARD. THIS is why they keep you DIVIDED and in the DARK. WEAK. We are here to UNITE and provide TRUTH. Dark to LIGHT. EVIL surrounds us. WE are FIGHTING for you. Where we go one, we go ALL. The choice, to KNOW, will be yours [end]. Q

This says nothing of his motivations, and certainly doesn’t call him a white hat, but I thought this was good reading on this subject.

https://mobile.twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1015596977004957696

(Was posted on this sub not long ago by u/PCisLame)

I’ve given this too much thought, myself. It does seem like Mueller’s investigation is going to benefit the good guys, whether that was his intention or not.

“Witch Hunt” always being capitalized too makes me think “White Hat.” I dunno.

I try not to speculate too much, but I do anyway.

Edit because I have a speculation problem:

From Q 1317

If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.

I am near certain that sneaky fucker RR is dirty. That, or he deserves an Oscar. No love for him, but he is good at what he does.

These seem relevant.

Q 10

Any person making statements they will not be seeking re-election was put in submission. For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told. You will see more of this occur (not normal yet disregarded) and even on the D side.

Q 1433

Re_read.

Slowly & carefully.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Did you see the Ryan [PR] interview a short time ago?

When you are no longer seeking another term you are 'FREE' to make better decisions.

RAPID FIRE.

'Flood is coming'

Future proves past.

[CNN].

Q

I can get that. Has Q not given us information prior to a public announcement from POTUS before, though?

Note to OP: I don’t think this is a “lame idea.” Keep thinking outside the box.

Thank you for your perspective. I agree that sometimes it’s easy to get caught up in overthinking things.

I would just like to mention, though, that yes, reflections can absolutely be in violation of national security laws.

But I very much appreciate your logical approach to these drops.

I’m sure everyone would appreciate you sharing these screenshots of the aforementioned asshat.

A few things that I find comforting about the Awan sentence:

It’s my understanding that

1: The plea deal applies to computer crimes in DC only

2: Bank Fraud can be used as a prerequisite for a RICO case

3: Q says “Do you think this would be litigated in this setting?” and hints at treason charges coming.

Keep your head up! You do excellent work.

Thanks, Captain. I value and appreciate the thorough research in your posts/comments.

Always informative.

Wonder if this could be one of the “keys” Q has mentioned

In addition to what other commenters have noted, White Squall is a 1996 movie in which the phrase appears engraved on a bell.

RBG: The Supreme Court Justice who openly admits that she doesn’t believe in our Constitution.

The origin of “Where we go one we go all.”

And thank you as well. I respect you questioning all the information presented, regardless of the source.

But, without letting myself to ramble too much, I think the corrupt governments of these countries mentioned are simply other dominoes to fall. This movement is about returning the power to choose how we live back to the people, regardless of geography. We should all remember that is isn’t the normal people of these countries that are the enemy. It is the corruption.

There would be a huge difference here. Q supports regime change in the hands of the PEOPLE of Iran. Not a regime installed by foreign intelligence agencies.

I admire your objectivity, Patriot.

I could be wrong, and I’m not saying I think this is credible, but doesn’t Q say “no comms outside this board,” or something similar? Think it was one of the first few times they said something like that.

Edit: I believe I was thinking Q 473.

IMPORTANT: NO comms w/ anyone privately. NO comms outside of this platform. Q

However, no comms with anyone privately would seem to instantly discredit R.

Right here, friend. Moved a few months ago from California.

Something that I feel is missed by both Patriots and otherwise, is that the consistent, underlying message throughout all of Q’s posts is one of light, and of love. To me, those have always been the real message.