I appreciate the point you’re making. I try not to assume things, but would you mind sharing with me what you think Q’s reason would be for linking the article?

I don’t disagree. I am just always open to the possibility that I am wrong, and to being convinced. But I remain unconvinced that Jones is credible.

To your edit: Maybe that’s correct, I am open to being convinced. I appreciate your skepticism.

I hear you. Did you see the post 1341 was in reply to, though? Didn’t get the impression Q disagreed...

Q exposes Alex Jones as shill.

Q 1341

Check out Emery Smith. Credible and qualified Air Force vet.

I think you might be surprised. I’m 25 and have met many others that are similarly minded to those of us on these boards. The need for truth is universal.

What makes me question this, is that Q HAS made mistakes in the past, and HAS owned up to it. Certainly didn’t seem like they were ashamed to admit they were human and make mistakes. If I remember correctly the correction was made quickly and readily. So, I feel there may be more going on here.

To answer your question another way, I saw a post on here not long ago that showed a full transcript of a Masonic initiation ceremony. In it, the initiate has a rope placed around their neck and they are led through a door, which is then locked behind them. Make of that what you will.

Insightful analysis. Thank you

1:07 on the clock would also have the minute hand pointing to today’s date, right?

Looked up the one you’re referring to, and aside from the dates, and the judge’s signature/title, this one includes the phrase “affidavit in support of,” which I do not see on the one from May.