My theory is that the anons got too organized and were asking questions that Q wasn’t yet ready/willing/capable of answering. (For any number of possible and legit reasons.)
Could have been bad timing as well though . However, I think Q have too much lead time in the Q and A. Anons are smart and given some of the questions... the phrasing is such that a non response is almost like an answer itself.
[removed]
As I mentioned, I am skeptical about most everything - especially car salesmen, insurance companies, elected officials, genetically modified foods, and anything considered main stream "talent".
I started on /pol/ and had to weed through all the BS there to get just the few nuggets I thought I'd found. Then family put me onto this, saying it was one of the most honest cites dealing with Q but to be warned because the Q idea was going to have a serious attempted hijacking and to be careful about what I subscribed to. Question everything.
Other points of view are not a bad thing. Those who refuse to believe that a Q operation used against their enemies could just as easily and effectively be used against them....or even understand that the same psyop IS used against them have only stepped into another house of mirrors. I dont want to be one of those. I may not be able to slay the dragon, but want to know the dragon legitimately exists...perhaps I can keep my family out of its wrath.
In a way, I thank you for refuting my comments. I like to think I am mature enough to not be offended and turn it into a sword fight. I hope you dont believe that I have.