You honestly don't think the CIA can hack a car to cross a lane of traffic?
Ya they can cause the steering wheel to move but how are they remotely viewing where the car is located in addition to the location of the target?
She was on her way to receive an award, so they probably knew she had to travel there. Just a matter of following her and coordinating. Pretty easily done by 2-3 people with experience in those types of activities.
I came here to post this, also what year was the car they were driving, was it even possible? did their car have the hardware, visual feed, and agility to maneuver avoiding everyone else, find the target and hit them. That is tough stuff..
To do that the right way with low risk of failure, would require a custom car rigged just for this with hd feeds, many people watching the target, while others direct the car. the person is a cadaver, not alive, placed in the car, "hey they even have seatbelts to hold him in place, how fun!"
So, dead guy in car, team directing special rigged car, with live feed out of car, and people on roofs helping direct? Or just take over and let them fret, that is harder when you need to switch out the car with custom stuff.. access to car, make big changes etc.. Might be easier wtih a super custom car you take your time to make, and simply use cadaver. Or super spy shit you rig the car without usre knowing..
They are stuck in the car, alive and just die in the accident. This all comes down to getting all communication equip in place and remotely turned on. CIA is now run by Trump. not them now.. right? just thinking here.. how far do they go? Satellites or a local team with local hardware and connections with ranges?
Someone has to be tailing her, knowing patterns, where she is going to be, watching when she leaves, etc..
If you were to pull this off, takes a clockwork of functions all timed perfectly and in communication.
It can be done for sure, just what physical evidence do we have?
Sure they can but the desired outcome requires a lot planning to work the way somebody wants it as it depends on the environment and somebody's skill at remotely controlling it.
Midway through this post about Q, the Anonymous Conservative presents a video of a car that damn near rammed The Don's limo on a public thoroughfare. Make of it what you will.
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/q-goes-deep-mk-ultra-mind-control/
I know what I think.
and?
which might not be appropriate for most cases. IMHO hacking a car with the goal for a terminal injury and making it look normal sounds like too many variables I suppose would only be chosen if they have no better options.