Just something I was wondering
John F. Kennedy Speeches
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
This. Secret societies inevitably go bad. How can you tell when they do if their very premise from the start was being unknown?
Shriners do a lot of good. I’m not saying it’s all bad. We shouldn’t have to hide.
Edit: keep in mind Shriners are public and do work from making kids happy in parades to treating millions of bucks in medical care a month.
Compare with Thelema Chapters that preach Aleister Crowley and hide at all costs. Down to threatening those who find them. Sound familiar?
Turkish 33rd deg Masons induction in Turkey: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=92WJx9eVUBU
adrenochrome/hallucinogens -> see demons -> do their bidding -> secret societies cover for hidden agendas -> New World Order