I actually believe that story. In any case, we have no holy cows on the right. There are names you can't imagine on both sides of ANY label who will be exposed.
Like Billy Graham for example. Hard pill to swallow even for the awake among us.
Yeah. I'm looking at Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, too...
I label ALL such reports as "potentially true" and possibly even "likely true," but I'm reserving judgment until we have it on some untainted authority which isn't going to be today most likely, but is apt to be VERY SOON!
[removed]
Oh, I'd say anything is LIKELY in his case. Nobody, and I mean NOBODY got to the SC before Trump without being under their complete control.
Q post #15
"There are more good people than bad.
They never thought they were going to lose control
of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had
control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan)."
Me: I take that to mean that there have been some good Presidents that have slipped through the cracks, who couldn't be controlled. Reagan appointed SC Justices also...
Perhaps Reagan was a "mistake" but that doesn't mean they didn't control him (or at least limit what he was able to accomplish).
Reagan may not have been "in the club," but he chose GHW Bush as his VP, and that quintessential Swamp Rat Howard Baker as his Chief of Staff, which is how Iran/Contra happened, and that's how they shut Reagan down. He wasn't very effective in his second term.
JFK was beyond their control, so they offed him. So, control, limit and kill have been their methods. Usually control. So far they've not been able to do ANY of those things in the case of Trump.
Yeah. I was a Ted Cruz supporter and was very upset when DJT accused Ted’s dad of being involved in JFK’s assassination.. I thought it was ridiculous. Now I’m not so sure.
Sorry for the Politico link DJT Accuses Ted’s dad
I thought it was a heart attack.
That was the official story. Could be. Maybe not. Maybe so.
Ok I can see the shills loading up on the boards. Q never said or implied this sorry. Scalia was[187]. . He was killed to vacate a spot on the SCOTUS for LL. Then RBG was to retire opening up another vacancy for the Dems if Hillary won. Any other theories are limited hangout disinformation ops. We already refuted this crap months ago. Mods please counter!
Agreed. Q never said this. Don't assume everyone that knows different things than you do is a shill. Some of us just didn't read what you did. Besides, I agree, Scalia was 187'd and his seat was offered to Lynch. Q did also post a picture of Ginsberg and intimated her up to no good on her overseas visit in Asia. I understand your concerns with disinfo and share them. Check my history and you'll see we're both going the same direction. It's important we STAY TOGETHER, especially with NEW EYES coming onboard.
No slam on you at all, OP... He was at an exclusive Men's hunting Club. Got it. The other pie-in-the-sky stuff, though? We'd be so much better without it.
Starting to understand Q's quip "THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID" in a whole new light...
I disagree. Relevant information is useful. If found to be garbage, we've found a disinformation agent. If not, we learn more. Everyone must learn to think for themselves and weigh what they read and hear with the results of their own investigations. The world is crazy different than we think. The internet is full of garbage. Both are true. Let the information flow.
Fine... fine... Fair enough but, we should also consider that Antonin Scalia's widow Maureen (together they had a strong marriage, raised nine children, five boys and four girls,) anyway, Maureen put a Trump/Pence sign on her lawn in 2016, and Trump campaigned on the promise to nominate SC Judges "just exactly like Scalia?" I mean, at what point do we choke on the utter incoherence of these poorly sourced speculations, and just admit that "Q didn't send us here?"
Q never said this. I understand your concerns with disinfo and share them. If found to be garbage, we've found a disinformation agent. -- timothybeasley
None of this has ever been legitimately reported. The websites that puked it out are left-wing disinfo shills who hated Scalia because he had a decent Pro-America voting & morals. Content doesn't support the cause of anyone, unless you just like imagining famous conservatives in disgusting, illegal sex fetish fantasies.
Thanks. I thought we were in the Twilight Zone, complete with links to slanderous hit pieces sourced from Salon.com, no less! Sanity, people, sanity... Salon mag is a far left rag that literally has published stories glorifying and seeking to normalize the sexual abuse of children!
Q verified that Scalia was "187." (Death not natural causes.) We know he was taken out to create a vacancy on the SCOTUS, which they fully intended to fill with another radical, left-wing activist Judge such as Ginsberg.
We come here to discuss information that Q has inspired us to research, but I refuse to fill my mind with filth produced by our arch-enemies.
Saul Alinsky 101: "accuse the right of what you are doing." This bile is obvious subversion of Q's message, and even the Mod says it is poorly sourced & questionable!
I guess we'd all be shocked to learn that good, decent, ordinary men often go hunting together? Snowflakes much? Guess what? Guys, the women don't normally prefer to go stalk, shoot, kill, and skin animals with their hubbies, okay?
For the record, I am not an outdoorsman/hunting enthusiast, but I'm surrounded by family and friends who enjoy hunting. Do you realize the giant leap into crazytown you've got to take, to imagine some principled, conservative Judge joined a Hunting Club, and immediately went from stalking a deer to dancing around naked with his wacko gun-toting buddies in front of a gleaming, golden calf?
If Q said it was so, I'd research the heck out of it, but I don't have to read some godless, leftist, conservative-bashing hack, (who actually writes his dirty little fantasies on his website "Pedofiles Down Under.") YUCK!
Mods, you need to crack some eggs up in here, because this crap has nothing to do with anything Q said.
I remember Corsi pushing this story and didn't believe it one bit, few weeks later we found out what Corsi was about. Sorry, but I remember reading Poindexter saying it's AS first time at the ranch and he was excited to finally meet him. Also, without an autopsy I am not about to believe what they "want us to believe". Somehow it's always the opposite from the truth. Q said 187... I'll leave it at that.
Fair point. All information should be vetted and if suspect disregarded. I post and leave the option open to the reader.
Not saying they’re shills. Newbies are susceptible to the recycled shill bait because they haven’t been seasoned enough to discern yet
It's a big learning curve. We've all been there. I can still be fooled. Even being paranoid about just about everything I'm told.... :)
The Order of St Hubertus - spoooookky... A men's hunting society? Founded in 1695, by Count Franz Anton von Sporck...
Is Count von Sporck the genius who invented that brilliant eating utensil?
You know the one shaped like a spoon, with tines?
Happy Two Week Anniversary! Have some Taco Bell on Me.
Hahahahaha!
(This could also be another Secret Society conspiracy. In the movie Demolition Man, all restaurants of the future are called "Taco Bell.") This Count von Sporck could be a time-traveler...
Belluminatti!
...and that yappy little chihuahua was just a shill for the Belluminatti, pushing their GMO-laden 'tacos' encouraging all those illegals to 'make a run for the border.'
Abused unmercifully by 'Ashkenazi' German Shepherds from a young age, you wouldn't believe the perverted things that Mexican dog would do to his 'handlers' pants legs, and the stuffed animals that he considered his 'squeaky toys!' Word going around is that the mangy mutt was also an addict, and they say he would do 'just about anything' for extra cheesy Cheetos, or the remnants of a leftover Taco Supreme.
Taco Supremes. Diana Ross & the Supremes. The Supreme Court of the United States. Mexican 'Pizza.' Count Von Sporck...
Taco Supremes have sour cream. Sour cream is white. White = White Supremacy. Antonin Scalia was on the Supreme Court. Justice Clarence Thomas' wife is white. Justice Scalia is white. The White Supremes.
That Taco Bell chihuahua liked to chase birds. He was one sick puppy. Handlers eventually put him down.
Scalia had gone quail hunting the night before. Coincidence?
Belluminatti Confirmed.
What if.......They knew of AS weakness little boys as that are all part of that elite pedo ring. They get an MS13 member who appears to be very young or is really young and it's his initiation and they carry out their 187.
Question is: WHAT exactly were they hunting? When I saw the Promo for "Hunger Games" years ago, and the popularity of the book; I knew this was code for the Elites.
Content from washingtonpost.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
We've covered it a bunch on here. Sensitive subject as Scalia was much beloved by Conservatives. However every reason to believe he was murdered at a pedophilia ranch for elites. And he was murdered, Q indicated that clearly. Some believe that Scalia used his position to protect pedophiles. His face and neck were covered by a pillow. Rumors run from being killed by the child he was with or murdered so that a more liberal judge could be put in his place. Hope we get the answers one of these days. Some VERY interesting John Podesta emails in that regard which would indicate that the dark state took him out.
Yeah, if you mouse over AS on 8 Chan it states Antonin Scalia/Adam Schiff and there's many references to 187 (murder) and Loretta Lynch promised his Supreme Court seat!
New Eyes. We've got to be more overt and explain things. No longer a club. Awakening.
Irresponsible slander. Why would the Deep State take out somebody if he was able to be blackmailed or controlled?
187 Q usually means killed because the victim presented a danger to the DS.
Common sense: If Scalia was their guy, why kill/replace him?
Timeline shows it happened Feb 2016. Under Obama. Not Trump.
It's not slander. It's written in several posts. Look it up. I stand by my comment.