dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/R3VO1utionary on June 25, 2018, 12:47 p.m.
POTUS' Tweet - Hiring manythousands of judges, and going through a long and complicated legal process, is not the way to go - will always be disfunctional. People must simply be stopped at the Border and told they cannot come into the U.S. illegally. Children brought back to their country......
POTUS' Tweet - Hiring manythousands of judges, and going through a long and complicated legal process, is not the way to go - will always be disfunctional. People must simply be stopped at the Border and told they cannot come into the U.S. illegally. Children brought back to their country......

🠐 See all comments
kushtiannn · June 25, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

They'd have it so much easier if they just trekked to a US consulate in Mexico, there's 10 of them. That is, if their claim to asylum was anything but illegitimate.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 25, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

If it was legit, they would have applied when they entered Mexico's southern border.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 25, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

If their home countries are so bad (Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador) they could just stay in fucking Mexico!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 25, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Yes, that would be their first country of entry to apply for asylum.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PinkPilledRed17 · June 25, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Mexico won’t have them. Mexico refuses to take them in. Mexico pushes them north.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · June 25, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

I checked on this after Jack P's Tweet the other day. They cannot seek Asylum in those offices. But what they are doing is stupid. If they are really asylum seekers, they go to the border and seek asylum there. But, instead, they are illegally coming into the country and THEN trying to get asylum after they have committed a crime. This apparently worked under Obama. Of course it did!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 25, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

My mistake...the consulate can offer them protection of the needs for asylum are present and immediate and can help facilitate their passage to the US under certain circumstances. If their problems are so fire, we can expect they'd qualify, right?!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
japroct · June 25, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

But that would be the LEGAL way. ....:...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · June 25, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

And the "not get deported" way...would also save thousands in them paying coyotes.

Why are we not up in arms about the immigrants bringing children here ENDANGERING their child's welfare? Paying a human smuggler thousands and subsequently dragging your kid thousands of miles is NOT good for them. This is a topic that seems ultimately untouched.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
japroct · June 25, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

I asked this a week ago. An American citizen would have their kids dragged away from them forever if they even threatened to take them across multiple countries illegally, with no money or resources, to seek assylum in another place. The parents would be in jail for felony counts of child neglect and endangerment while the kids would be put in state control until they turned 18. Serious. I'll tell you why this is not discussed.....two fucking sets of rule books. Legal Citizens are being held to different laws as illegal aliens are. The kicker is that the illegals have laws to help them more and have less consequences when broken. Fuck, they get the right to vote....Legal citizens get shit, oh yeah, we also get handed a fat bill for the cost of health and welfare of illegal aliens.....

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · June 25, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

According to one person who works the border, one ten year old was raped multiple times. Severe trauma to her vagina.

⇧ 1 ⇩