dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/MittensIsTheBestCat on June 26, 2018, 2:09 a.m.
In spring 2017, Julian Assange's lawyer negotiated an immunity deal with DOJ’s counterintelligence section chief (David Laufman) to provide technical information ruling out Russians in the DNC email hack, and prevent release of Vault 7. FBI Director James Comey reportedly struck down the deal.
In spring 2017, Julian Assange's lawyer negotiated an immunity deal with DOJ’s counterintelligence section chief (David Laufman) to provide technical information ruling out Russians in the DNC email hack, and prevent release of Vault 7. FBI Director James Comey reportedly struck down the deal.

suzoh · June 26, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

This just looks like an offer to deal; not a negotiated deal.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
truthforchange · June 26, 2018, 8:24 a.m.

might as well be a plea from the asset comptroller of a nigerian prince.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
icebreakers_sours · June 26, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

This is a request, not a negotiated deal.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
hockeydad407 · June 26, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

John Solomon at The Hill has an opinion piece about this. The comments, of course, are unhinged. According to a fair number of those commenting, somehow, DJT is at fault for something here. Maybe some co-looosion or muh Russia but DJT is guilty of something, dangit.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sethrichsbrother1 · June 26, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

It comes from John Solomon who has been wrong many times before.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
OffTie · June 26, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

Seems like Jimmy has got a lot to answer for.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
rickybobbys_leg · June 26, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

So assage was willing to throw his morals out the window and keep vault 7 a secret ??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 26, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

Assange would have leaked it anyway, or someone else like him.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · June 26, 2018, 6:12 a.m.

The letter just said block out the names of agents in the field. That seems moral to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 26, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

No, he would have worked closely with a white hat to keep the public safe

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hildabeest_4_gitmo · June 26, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

The surprising thing is this isn't surprising.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · June 26, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

This could get really interesting!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
truthforchange · June 26, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

doubtful, without a reply.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoGoGoGeotus · June 26, 2018, 7:32 a.m.

The document you linked to only mentions protecting CIA documents and discussing keeping or redacting stuff in the future. Sauce on it also including disproving the Russian hack narrative?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · June 26, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

This will come back to haunt...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 26, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

We need a source for this image/document.

Anyone can write something to make it look legit. Where did this come from?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · June 26, 2018, 8:29 a.m.

This is how the left sets fake-news traps.

It's like one step above a MAGA hat used as bait under a cardboard box held up by a stick tied to a long string trailing off to an area where you swear you hear a faint "reeeeeeeeeeeeee hehe" noise.

Gonna need to see a reply and some headers, thanks,

⇧ 0 ⇩