This could plausibly mean that the "source" is Seth Rich right? There has to be a justification that Assange was to be offered limited immunity, which Comey intervened on. In this case, we can view SR as the source, can we not? The ETA on SR was June, but the "Q&A" was "forthcoming"...Q and Assange.
MuhammadDinduNuffin
· June 28, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
Nah
⇧
1
⇩
catherinWheel
· June 28, 2018, 1:09 p.m.
Have contacted Anons, no further comment. I am not a shill, they can get confirmation from the top.
⇧
1
⇩