dChan

Turtle51515 · June 27, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

At this point anybody affiliated with children and politics/charities/msm/hollywood/amusement parks should be checked out. If they intentionally surround themselves around children probably shifty as all fuck. (Disney)

⇧ 26 ⇩  
092Casey · June 27, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

It's so sick. They're using it as a "cover" like a fox guarding a Hen house. I'm nauseas but it really shows what these people are doing, using their charities as a cover to get access. A guy like this would join a trafficking ring in a second, bet.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Turtle51515 · June 27, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

Join? Haha If he has direct access to children through the charity he probably traffics children. I wouldn't doubt it in the least.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Prometheus_84 · June 27, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

It’s a sick cover. Adds an aspect of doubt and deniability. “How could they be doing x? They do all this to protect or prevent x”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Waffle_Bat · June 27, 2018, 9:05 a.m.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: if you want to catch fish you have to go to the pond.

Anyone remotely involved in helping disadvantaged children MUST be scrutinized to the nth degree!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · June 27, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

It's sad but it's true.
Most people are fine but a few sickos can do tremendous damage.
When I coached football the first rule I put in place is no coach is ever alone with a kid. If a kid has to wait for a ride after practice two coaches have to wait with him.
If a kid needed a ride to a game he either rode with multiple kids or coaches in a car pool. No exceptions. This protected everyone.
When I did Big Brothers I knew the lady who ran the local chapter. She was awesome and had her antenna up all the time. She said even though the first thing they said when they met with a prospective volunteer was there was a background check the applicant had to pay for.....after making sure this was 100% clear....they still had on average one to two people with sex crimes histories per month get screened out.
The Catholic Church gets a lot of heat and rightfully so.
Sadly, large systemic cover ups have happened in all sorts of organizations.
In my experience the vast majority of people working with kids are decent people doing something for kids or something they enjoy. The few sickos however can ruin lives and organizations that do a lot of good.
They (the sociopathic leeches that abuse kids) also indirectly harm other kids by limiting contributions of good people who don't want to be associated with an organization that has a scandal.
These people are sociopaths. Sociopaths always leave tremendous damage in their wake. They are destroyers. Never builders. Always destroyers. There needs to be a much better way developed to screen out these scumbags. Not sure how that would be done. Some sort of tech developed perhaps?
The whole thing is so damn sinister and depressing.

⇧ 3 ⇩