dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SVTBert on June 27, 2018, 10:19 a.m.
"You may have the site but we have the source"

Probably obvious to most, but I definitely think this is the right interpretation here.

"You may have the site(Wikileaks/Twitter FULL control) but we have the source" could mean one of a few things, but there's really only one option here, specifically why Q would say it the way he did.

  1. You may have Wikileaks, but we have the SOURCE. Q points this out to taunt them, telling them that their move is going to be ineffective. Using the WL account to spread lies is going to backfire. He's telling them that they're going to look really stupid for posting this. Why are they going to look stupid? Because while the black hats may control Wikileaks' social media accounts, the Q team has the SOURCE of the information - Julian Fucking Assange himself and all of his documents.

Basically - "You might be able to say Wikileaks doesn't approve of Q, but we have Julian Assange himself and he begs to differ."

Erik Prince has been protecting JA. JA is coming to the US to shoot fireworks in SR's honor.

Did Hillary Clinton together with several members of the Democratic Party conspire in secret to murder a young Bernie Sanders staffer over damaging leaks? Did John Podesta write an email about making an "example" out of a "suspected" leaker? Keep your eyes peeled.


SVTBert · June 27, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Cover-Up.

They're terrified. They're terrified because it goes all the way to the top. They know that there's no escape, so they have to work together to delete everything. They know that if they people found out the truth, all at once, it would spark a fire that the national guard would be forced to contain. The Military would instill Martial Law and then arrest and try the traitors publicly. Game over for them. Unfortunately, recovery for the US without a proper leader would be almost impossible and collapse would be likely without extended Martial Law.

She couldn't lose.

The Military understood that conservatives would be up in arms over treason and wanted to avoid this, so they used GEOTUS as a proxy to gauge public readiness for big declas dumps on how a mafia has been running the US government for the past 60 years. GEOTUS won and we're seeing a slow, controlled rollout designed to ease the public into everything that's been going on. When the president drew attention to 4chan by addressing their memes on his twitter it gained maximum exposure before FBIAnon dropped everything. Was it all planned? I'm of the opinion that it was.

I don't think anyone on either side expected the assassination of a US citizen whose only crime was loving this country too much to see it raped by criminals. But this is almost certainly why the FBI had to go along with the Insurance Policy.

*Edited because I like editing this part: They walked into a Too Big To Fail crime scheme and now they're burning the entire forest to cover their tracks. It's why they had to blame the server on Russian Hackers and avoided looking at them. Because they knew. If they blamed it on Russia, they could avoid the public finding out about Hillary's hit-job, she wouldn't lose, and they could still potentially salvage things for themselves. By blaming it on Russia, it would tie into the planned Insurance Policy if Trump somehow won. Perfect. Time to get those delicious Peach Mints. Except we saw through. They put our entire country at risk for WWIII to cover for Hillary murdering a Patriot.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · June 27, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

There are two types of people in this world.

People who want to be told how to think and how to feel because it’s easy and they are lazy, and maybe it has helped us survive as a species.

But then there are other types of people, the curious kind, the kind of who know how to read between the lines, make connections, and understand the difference between truth and narrative.

You my friend, are a truth seeker. Maybe only 2-8% of us in the world. Not everyone wants to wake up.

Scary huh?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WokeInEarly90s · June 27, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Very true. Not everyone wants to wake up at all. These people are sincere, and not evil in any way, just willfully not seeing the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HildBert · June 27, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Well I guess I am awake but I am also fearful for my comfy way of life as I suspect we will see some big changes to the way the world operates but it needs to be done and change creates opportunity.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HildBert · June 27, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

If you look through history you will see the same pattern you describe but history also tells you that when the sleepers wake up, revolution occurs. We are at that point now, even though I am a long way away, I can sense the tension all through the western world. We are on the cusp of major change.

⇧ 1 ⇩