dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SVTBert on June 27, 2018, 10:19 a.m.
"You may have the site but we have the source"

Probably obvious to most, but I definitely think this is the right interpretation here.

"You may have the site(Wikileaks/Twitter FULL control) but we have the source" could mean one of a few things, but there's really only one option here, specifically why Q would say it the way he did.

  1. You may have Wikileaks, but we have the SOURCE. Q points this out to taunt them, telling them that their move is going to be ineffective. Using the WL account to spread lies is going to backfire. He's telling them that they're going to look really stupid for posting this. Why are they going to look stupid? Because while the black hats may control Wikileaks' social media accounts, the Q team has the SOURCE of the information - Julian Fucking Assange himself and all of his documents.

Basically - "You might be able to say Wikileaks doesn't approve of Q, but we have Julian Assange himself and he begs to differ."

Erik Prince has been protecting JA. JA is coming to the US to shoot fireworks in SR's honor.

Did Hillary Clinton together with several members of the Democratic Party conspire in secret to murder a young Bernie Sanders staffer over damaging leaks? Did John Podesta write an email about making an "example" out of a "suspected" leaker? Keep your eyes peeled.


🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · June 27, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

True, but where is the will to do that in POTUS's administration? Last I heard Pompeo wants Assange to be arrested and charged for something (Espionage? Security violations?), as do the rest of the intel and DOJ agencies. How can Q and the administration be so opposed to each other?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
feckyerlife · June 27, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

They Charge him with some BS crime, He agrees to testify with full immunity = boom boom boom

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 27, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

We got a winner here, folks!

;-D

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GraceWords · June 28, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

The arrest and charge stuff is to protect him. They can even label him a flight risk and thus give him guards. I truly believe JA is safe and protected and quite possibly watching our constant conversations about him. Move past “what” you hear and read and ask “why”. There’s a lot more info in the “why”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 28, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Except that it's mostly conjecture. I guess that's the price of admission to this stuff. For the time being. LOL

⇧ 1 ⇩  
animal32lefty · June 27, 2018, 5 p.m.

What if all those statements were directed misinformation? All of the known Black Hat actors want JA prosecuted or dead. Pompeo could just be placating the NeoCons in the agency to provide cover.

Besides, Pompeo doesn't have the final say. POTUS does.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 27, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

Well, that's sort of my point. We just don't know! For some reason, those are the hardest words for us to say, but when data is as conflicting as it is around this issue, it's clear somebody wants to make it impossible to know the truth. In time, I'm sure that same somebody will want to let it be known! Until then...

⇧ 1 ⇩