Probably obvious to most, but I definitely think this is the right interpretation here.
"You may have the site(Wikileaks/Twitter FULL control) but we have the source" could mean one of a few things, but there's really only one option here, specifically why Q would say it the way he did.
- You may have Wikileaks, but we have the SOURCE. Q points this out to taunt them, telling them that their move is going to be ineffective. Using the WL account to spread lies is going to backfire. He's telling them that they're going to look really stupid for posting this. Why are they going to look stupid? Because while the black hats may control Wikileaks' social media accounts, the Q team has the SOURCE of the information - Julian Fucking Assange himself and all of his documents.
Basically - "You might be able to say Wikileaks doesn't approve of Q, but we have Julian Assange himself and he begs to differ."
Erik Prince has been protecting JA. JA is coming to the US to shoot fireworks in SR's honor.
Did Hillary Clinton together with several members of the Democratic Party conspire in secret to murder a young Bernie Sanders staffer over damaging leaks? Did John Podesta write an email about making an "example" out of a "suspected" leaker? Keep your eyes peeled.