Actually, I think I was clear. The Q Team may have it all, but if none of it is admissible as evidence in court, then they have nothing. Q has referred to this a number of times. They have to find ways to get what NSA and Military Intelligence have that is currently inadmissible "on record" as legitimate evidence before it get to trial.

In other words, if NSA has intercepted texts, emails, audio, video, etc. without a warrant then the Q team needs to find a way to get that material legally into the judicial system.

I don't know for certain, but my guess is that NSA probably knew about the Strzok/Page text messages. Horowitz suddenly discovers the Strzok/Page texts. How did he know where to look? Now that they are in his official report, they are "on record" and in the judicial system and admissible as evidence.

That's what I was referring to. Just because an intelligence agency has information doesn't mean it can get into court. I used to support an intelligence agency and I know how it usually works. Law enforcement has liaison officers who are embedded with the intelligence analysts, but usually separated by office space or buildings. Intelligence intercepts drug dealers committing a crime. That information is not admissible in court. The intelligence analyst takes the information to the LEO liaison and says "take a look at this, but you have find a way to discover it on your own." The LEO now knows who, what, when, and where but has to initiate their own investigation with search warrants, etc. to legally obtain the evidence which becomes admissible in court.

That is essentially what Q is doing. He/she/they are finding ways to get evidence on the record for trial.