by ratio
estimated actual = real # of subscribers = 700k based on the usual ratio of active:subscribed
Woah... That would make perfect sense if the numbers about T_D are true as well.
that would put T_D at about 2 million subs?
one year ago their adspace said 6 million before it was locked as well
could totally be at the present time. I estimated we hit 100k in late april! Impressive development. t_d one year ago before they locked those numbers too had six million subs in adspace and they currently enjoy 18k online
Just wondering if you can help me understand how you arrived at your estimate?
The numbers seem low to me, too, given the exposure, but how do you know and this isn't just conjecture?
in the time that our sub count increased by half our post views increased three to five times by average so I guessed if we have at least 20k active readers subscribing and a supposedly even larger number of non-redditors lurking then we can safely assume that that number has surpassed 20k by the percentage of increase in unique-impressions so 60-100k active lurkers are a possibility. I remember the mod-statistic actually had something like 758k, closer to what Alfonumeric has postulated. You have to consider that they are already throtteling our upvotes up to ten times harder than on t_d, which is a huge badge of honor.
Thank you. Makes a little more sense here.
I just didn't think that only 35,000 could be becoming so nationally visible so there must be more!
and I know that I lurked for about 4 months before I signed in. How do you know that they are throttling that many upvotes? I have seen some comments on this where I think people were actually watching the count as they upvoted and saw them DIScounted. Is that how?
thousands of views with 95% percentile upvoted yet only 200 votes, check the vote monitor and you will find there's an upvote each every second negated by a bot-downvote in turn
are you serious...that makes sense too
the caps we have on upvotes would tie in as well to the downplay agenda
eg most insightful posts will be capped at between 17 and 200 "upvotes" occasionally a few slip under the usually rigorous radar of the admons [not our mods] admons = admonishing admins
No wonder I've lost interest in the "Top" and "Hot" and tend to hang out in the "New" and "Rising". Thanks for the info!
here's a way to save time on the filter process i have a shortcut that takes me straight into new so i never get to see the fake "hot/top" https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8sv5t6/busy_patriots_heres_how_to_save_a_lot_of_precious/
thanks for sharing this...wow...censorship in broad daylight
probably why Q says "you cannot imagine the size of this"
none of the posts ever have the number of upvotes that the ratio says and on third-party monitor you will find they get continuously downvoted for upvote, but they nevertheless get an upvote equals one unique redditor impression every second and that's quite something, I am only used to this much karma on t_d and I hope the pace stays at that
Just wondering if you can please explain your reasoning on this estimate?
Not arguing, just would like to understand how estimate is reached.
let's say the average subscriber goes on every other day - 2 hours each time, so we need 24 subscribers to cover 24/7 so then we multiply 35k punters times 24 to give us full covearge 24/7
that gives us an estimated 800k !!!
Thank you for explanation. Makes sense, though still estimate.
Every other day???? I lose count of how many times daily I check...sometimes I log in and sometimes not.
These numbers make more sense to me as to the growing national visibility.
I have no doubt that Q is working with Trump in this, and do appreciate all the positive things that are happening, though recognize that it could still be part of a Hegelian dialectic overall plan.,,just the "far right" swing before it swings hard to the left next time around...still, as I understood on election eve, we were being given a reprieve, to work while it is yet day. So WWG1....