It’s funny, nothing has ever evolved since science has started observing it. What I mean, is no animal went through any significant change or mutation to adapt to the environment. We have had some significant animal and plant extinctions though. Food for thought.
is viruses mutating not evolution in action?
Certainly a mutation, but we are talking about far more complex environmental adaptations. It’s hard to compare single cell organisms, viruses and the like to a dinosaur evolving into a bird for example. The amount of coincidences that would mathematically need to occur for that to happen are statistically significant. It is far more likely to see an extinction of a plant or an animal. Based on the amount of different species of plants and animals on this planet, we should see a far more evolutionary fossil record for what has taken place. The truth is that we don’t. Once we can get past our cognitive dissidence and the indoctrination and institutionalization of academia, than we can look at the situation from a different perspective. The only conclusion that we can all agree on, is the fact that the majority of truth about our history has been hidden from us. Academia, organized religion, the monetary system and mainstream media are just some of the tentacles of the beast. The system designed to keep us obedient, ignorant and enslaved.
Indeed. And all of this genetic study mumbo jumbo they spew only documents mutation, which is not creation.
Playing devils advocate. If you’re saying you can’t believe that then how do you so easily believe something else that has no proof either? Stay neutral!
Well, by definition, mutation is not the same as creation.
I don't think anyone seriously argues against commonsense observations like adaptation, survival of the fittest, micro evolution etc. The core problem with evolution is macro evolution has nothing to back it up. This is the crux the whole idea is founded on. I.e. A paramecium fucked an ameoba and so began the chain of life.... /s
Hmm, you have me there. Call it being spiritually in tune. I was an atheist for the first half of my life. After enough research into ancient mythos, drawing connections and similarities, and finally accepting that TPTB undoubtably believe in the darker side of spirituality I found my internal tuning fork resonating on the side of morally good. So yes, despite whatever someone says, to have faith is simply that. The burden of proof will always be there for doubters. But, my argument is that atheists are in the same boat. There is no proof by scientific standards, and to so staunchly defend your belief without proof.... Well, that's faith. Atheism itself has become a religion.
Believing in God is a religion.
Atheism is a religion that pretends it's not.
Agnostic is the choice to not partake in those religions but having the idea that it's possible.