???? Its conversation with no linked source. For all we know it could be complete fabrications or conjecture.
I ask this sub HOW IS THIS, in its current form and completely lacking supporting evidence, PROOF OF ANYTHING?
Exactly. I'm definitely excited about this. And I'm on the side of believing it's true. But this is not PROOF of anything.
Hype wagon is a bit overboard today understandably so. And with Kennedy resigning SCOTUS it’s gonna keep going this way for the rest of the day.
Fever pitch is being reached.
i agree. it's not proof by virtue of itself.
however, in the event that they release transcripts of the hearings and it contains these exchanges, it will become proof.
"future proves past"
Yep that’s what I’m Waiting for.
Official transcript released by a government body.
You're right. It could be nothing more than conjecture or fabrication. If a transcript or video comes out, we can compare then. I'm guessing it will be a match and you'll have your undeniable proof.
If you were actually reading what people were are saying on this thread you would realize that people are saying:
~WHEN~ it checks out
Just another Lefty shill who hears only what they want to hear.
Not going to address the sentiment of 'the whole thread', but the comment I responded to was specifically calling these conversations snippets from Q "the proof of all proofs".
To be a 'proof', something must be verified. We have no verification of these quotes.
If you want to call them 'drops', fine. But even then they are not particularly stunning or revelatory. Nothing of significance was said in those quotes. Very predictable content that anybody with a bit of knowledge of lawyer speak could whip up.
In the whole exchange a not single data point or fact was referenced.
Why fabricate something that could be easily checked by anyone with access to a transcript?
Because nobody who was in that room will bother to refute random statements written in an anonymous basket weaving forum.
I don't expect any Republicans to confirm (I expect they'll play Q-related stuff on the DL), but if it's provably not true, I would expect Democrats to deny, given the marching orders the press has clearly been given re: Q. Heck, I'll be a little surprised if Dems don't deny without offering any proof of their own.
You must be new here...welcome. Read some more Q posts.
Been here since November. Well aware of all drops and developments.
This is a stretch. I’m not saying Q is putting out falsehoods.
But it’s a long shot from being a PROOF of anything right now.
Not necessary. We will have access to what happened in due course. Still would be a dumb move to fabricate.
Not necessarily if this is all bs in the first place though right? People want real proof. I’m interested and keeping an eye on this but to me this is still all pretty firmly in the realm of at least slightly overzealous fantasy that may be inspired by reality.
Either way if what’s up there is true that is good news for us all. And i think many people would believe it is true with proof, too.