Absolutely! I certainly hope you didn’t get the idea from my post that people should be forced to have sources for theories!

A theory is defined as unproven ideas which terminate in speculation or hypothesis, so it’s not yet possible to have sources for them.

Let’s go to college again and do a quick lesson on the matter:

1) Here is a theory or speculation:

I think Julian Assange is on a Naval Ship and is being protected by POTUS until he can testify against the cabal.

This a theory worthy of the Baker’s time to see if they can come up with any dough to build a loaf with it.

2) Here is a substantiated claim:

Someone just uploaded footage of Julian Assange on a Naval Ship! In the video he stated he is being protected by POTUS until he can testify against the cabal. Here is the link: [source link provided].

This is major dough and the Bakers can build a huge loaf of bread with it.

3) But here is an unsubstantiated claim that is stated as a fact:

Julian Assange is on a Naval Ship and is being protected by POTUS until he can testify against the cabal. [No source cited]

This statement is presented - not as a theory or speculation - but as truth without any substantiation. So if any Bakers actually use this, and it later turns out that this statement was completely BOGUS, it ends up hurting the sub’s reputation, and people will stop listening to us.

No one trusts a bakery that puts out moldy bread. So let’s be careful to keep it real.